Dear mumax+ developers,
I am running an Antiferromagnet simulation on a rectangular track with two sublattices and interfacial DMI applied to sub1 only. The skyrmion responds correctly to uniform DMI changes but does not respond to spatially varying DMI, although the per-region values are stored and read back correctly via eval(). I would really appreciate your guidance on the right approach.
Test results:
I tested with minimize(), relax(), tight tolerance (tol=1e-12), and larger initial nucleation radius — all give 11 nm.
What is the correct way to apply a spatially varying interfacial DMI to a sublattice of an Antiferromagnet such that the kernel responds to the spatial variation? Is there a known limitation with per-region DMI in k_dmiFieldAFM, or am I missing a required step in the assignment pattern?
I can share a minimal reproducer script if helpful.
Thank you,
Sateesh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mumax2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mumax2+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mumax2/dfb7f85f-2aa3-4955-a98d-158dfc4fcce8n%40googlegroups.com.