2) With "uniform_refine = 1 " The decomposition is done with 2x2 element basis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "moose-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to moose-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/moose-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/moose-users/54182747-a62f-4616-aa0e-faac31eed254%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I don't think doing what you need is possible because of the way we do refinement. There needs to be a mapping from the level 0 elements to the level 1, if on level 1 you mark sub-element as subdomain 2, but the others as 1, what do you do on coarsening? Is it subdomain 1 or 2?
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Shohei Ogawa <ogawa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,Is it possible to define a sub-domain based on imported image on a generated mesh with uniform refinement?As far as I tired, even though I have " uniform_refine = 1" setting in the [Mesh] block, the domain decomposition with ImageSubdomain is resulting in the resolution of the initial grid size (i.e. before the uniform refinement) I am wondering how I could do the subdomain decomposition with refined mesh.1) Without "uniform_refine = 1" It looks working well.
2) With "uniform_refine = 1 " The decomposition is done with 2x2 element basis.
Thank you,Shohei
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "moose-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to moose-users...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/moose-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/moose-users/54182747-a62f-4616-aa0e-faac31eed254%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "moose-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to moose-users...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/moose-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/moose-users/CAGWYgTkQfBN-phQe9%3D4iNEHWee9jBPwZdnWuKrpZowB88rgSFg%40mail.gmail.com.
Is it possible with existing features? I am wondering how to get image data, thresholding to create element lists, and giving them back to coupled kernels or material properties.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/moose-users/2e5354f7-7ba4-4ac6-8d95-43a1b4fd76ca%40googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to moose-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/moose-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/moose-users/2e5354f7-7ba4-4ac6-8d95-43a1b4fd76ca%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "moose-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to moose-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/moose-users/CAK06EuW2YfYxfYo-8OJUk%3DzHU2ce_QmNwFT-grUML3vbBKFC%2BA%40mail.gmail.com.