Usefulness of 'Production' of term from native language
44 views
Skip to first unread message
les...@gmail.com
unread,
Sep 5, 2013, 11:15:53 PM9/5/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com
Hello,
Anyone have information on how useful it is to study 'Production' of a native word to a foreign word? I feel I might be doubling my work load and getting nowhere near equal return.
Thanks, Lesaun Harvey
George Wade
unread,
Sep 6, 2013, 4:57:04 AM9/6/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com
In my own personal experience production of a language turns up naturally after two or four months of listening to, or of reading it. I do take the step of doing simple exercises to anchor it.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com
Hi, that's a good question. It's well documented that "active" recall is far more powerful for learning than passively reviewing information - but all study in Mnemosyne or any SRS is a type of active recall. So, is production mode more effective than recognition for learning?
Here's one study:
"Effects of Recognition Task and Production Task on Incidental Vocabulary Learning of Iranian EFL Learners"
URL: http://www.irjabs.com/files_site/paperlist/r_683_130304200448.pdf
Result: Both had a significant effect, but production had a significantly higher effect (mean score of production group in vocabulary post-test was 48.50, while recognition group was 34.30, with p<0.05).
So that's a yes, in one study anyway. I don't have time to dig deeper in their references or Google Scholar to find other work on the topic, but maybe others here have further insights.
The question of whether that benefit is worth _double_ your time, if that is the case, is also an interesting one. For a start, it would be useful to know exactly how much workload is involved in both modes of study.
Oisín
Vit
unread,
Sep 10, 2013, 3:52:31 PM9/10/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to mnemosyne-...@googlegroups.com, les...@gmail.com
Hi, Lesaun Harvey.
If you use Two-sided cards 100% - you are NOT getting enough bang for your buck, IMO.
a. Please clarify how you design your Language cards; are they 1. WORD to WORD 2. WORD to Sentence 3. Sentence to sentence or a combination of All types ?
b. Do you use Two-sided or one-sided card type ? c. Do you re-formulate the Answer when it becomes the Question ( when you Create a Production card by Flipping the Original card - if you use one-sided card ) ?