hbralrimi

47 views
Skip to first unread message

fl

unread,
Dec 7, 2019, 8:52:14 AM12/7/19
to Metamath
I do not want to be ironic, of course, but I have the impression that we first replaced the 
venerable"( ph -> A. x ph)" by" F/ x ph" supposed to be more meaningful and that now 
to put in common factor some parts of the proofs we reintroduce"( ph -> A. x ph)" 
beside" F/ x ph" finally returning to the previous state and multiplying the proofs by two.

And we hope to fight against ecological disaster.

This civilization will die crushed under its own weight.

(By the way "Google Translate" may I recall Thee that the translation of the 
French word "démonstration" is "proof" not "demonstration". Please !)

-- 
FL

Norman Megill

unread,
Dec 7, 2019, 9:26:47 AM12/7/19
to Metamath
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages