You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Metamath
Can we use classical math proof as guideline for proving formal metamath theorems or formal proofs are totaly different?
Alexander van der Vekens
unread,
Nov 6, 2019, 3:08:26 AM11/6/19
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Metamath
Hi Filip,
of course you can - I used classical proofs as guideline for my proofs of the friendship theorem (see Huneke's paper) and cramer's rule (see Wikipedia!). But it's only a "guideline" - there is (usually) much more work to do, searching for theorems or proving them to fill the gaps within the classical proofs.