Excess penetration measurment in Radiograph

491 views
Skip to first unread message

sundarrajan kumaraswamy

unread,
Feb 17, 2015, 3:19:32 PM2/17/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
  How to measure the excess penetration from the Radiograph of Small bore piping  DWDI superimpose Radiograph shows low density near the inner wall,
what is acceptance criteria for excess penetration as per ASME B 31.3 code, Please clarify the IMAGE CONTRAST GRAPH method .

Regards,

K.Sundar Rajan

george....@gr.bureauveritas.com

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 2:24:50 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

On my opinion extreme low density at the root area could be an indication of excess penetration.
The most reliable method to measure excess penetration is UT thickness measurement

best regards

Dr. Georgios Dilintas

Authorized Nuclear Inspector
Authorized Inspector Supervisor

I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER
BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE

Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5
Fax: +30 210 40 63 118
Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04


Inactive hide details for sundarrajan kumaraswamy ---18/02/2015 05:04:58---  How to measure the excess penetration from the Radsundarrajan kumaraswamy ---18/02/2015 05:04:58---  How to measure the excess penetration from the Radiograph of  Small bore piping  DWDI superimpose

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/0ff884e9-b935-45ca-b277-d69e2324f37b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com

pkkani...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 3:08:34 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
As that particular location of the joint is having more deposition hence it will appear brighter than normal area of root , much the brighter means more the protrusion .based on  your experience you can take decisions .

Jignesh Desai

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 3:08:55 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

There is no direct method to measure the magnitude of excess penetration on small bore closed butt welds. 

 

The possibilities to get conclusion are as below.

 

1. Highly skilled RT film interpretation expert can give proper feedback. 

2. Keep mock up test pieces of welder along accepted RT films and compare these films with the production joint RT films. You may get some input.

3. Boroscope may be used to get an idea of internal penetration of the production weld. For small bore there could be limitation while turning probe/cable/camera tip.


Regds/Jignesh

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.


To view this discussion on the web visit

james gerald

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 3:22:56 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
First you need to determine what is your requirement.

1. Is it required for small diameter tubes where precise flow is required.
2. Is it required for Big Diameter Piping.

For small diameter tubing, you can try a steel ball run test. For the ID of the tube, determine the excess penetration acceptable and force a steel ball of applicable diameter through the tube. If it passes successfully, accept the Joint or reject simultaneously.

For Big diameter piping, Low density is an indication of the excess penetration in the RT Film. There is no acceptable exact measure of the density using densitometer. 
 
Thanks & Regards


J.Gerald Jayakumar
0091-9344954677


From: "george....@gr.bureauveritas.com" <george....@gr.bureauveritas.com>
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [MW:22888] Excess penetration measurment in Radiograph

meisam shokri arfaei

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 3:43:57 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
There is no way to measure exact amount of excess penetration in conventional radiography. The situation will be worse when you use super impose image. 

There is one way to measure the excess penetration when you have a sample radiograph of a step wedge (with small differences in thickness of each step, may be 0.5mm)  with the same exposure parameters and you can find the relation between each thickness to its film density (density gradient). However I think this way is not practical for the conventional radiography works because of such step wedge.

About the ball test I'm not agree with Mr. Gerald, because it is possible that you have two excess in a single seam  and each one of them could be acceptable but aggregation of them will cause don't passing the ball and make the seam reject.

Regards

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
M. Shokri Arfaei
ISA-ISTS - Metallurgy Lab. Manager
ASNT NDT Level III
International Welding Engineer





LALU RAJENDRAN

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 4:13:57 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

My opinion, in DWSI superimpose, you can see the excess penetration clearly. Please refer the attached image.

Please refer table 341.3.2 for acceptance criteria. However as Mr. Jerald mentioned earlier you can go for ball passing test to confirm the ID.


regards,
LALU
LINKS MIDDLE EAST
ABU DHABI, UAE

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
IMG_1524.jpg

george....@gr.bureauveritas.com

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 4:16:27 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

From ASME Code point of view none of those methods is acceptable



best regards

Dr. Georgios Dilintas

Authorized Nuclear Inspector
Authorized Inspector Supervisor

I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER
BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE

Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5
Fax: +30 210 40 63 118
Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04

george....@gr.bureauveritas.com

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 4:17:56 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

even this method would not be acceptable by an Authorized Inspector

george....@gr.bureauveritas.com

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 4:20:03 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

Ball passing test and any other method based on a go - no go gauge could be acceptable

S.Mohammed

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 8:45:21 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
from where to arrange ball?

is there standard size available?

Nandesh Kumar

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 11:59:24 AM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
These all are the reasons, evaluation of excess penetration using RT for pipes, is never referenced in any codes.

ವಂದನೆಗಳೊಂದಿಗೆ / Best regards,

Nandesh Kumar Arasappa

P.S. : Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 18/2/15, S.Mohammed <mohd...@gmail.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [MW:22899] Excess penetration measurment in Radiograph
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 18 February, 2015, 5:45 PM
--
You received this message because you are
subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials &
Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from
this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/77bec4cf-1331-47d0-acd4-2011d230fc2e%40googlegroups.com.

sundarrajan kumaraswamy

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 10:06:30 PM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
how to measure UT thickness measurement on small bore piping welds for excess penetration measurement.


Regards,

K.Sundar Rajan

sundarrajan kumaraswamy

unread,
Feb 18, 2015, 10:07:06 PM2/18/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

Yes, I agree with your Radiography image, but ASME B 31.3 acceptance criteria is only for Visual Inspection not for
Radiography image, moreover ball passing test is not specified in ASME standard,

Any idea about  Image Contrast graph method, Shell DEP has specified this test procedure for measuring Excess penetration,

Regards,

K.Sundar Rajan

Nandesh Kumar

unread,
Feb 19, 2015, 12:01:49 PM2/19/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sundar rajan Kumarswamy,

Please let me know the DEP number...

ವಂದನೆಗಳೊಂದಿಗೆ / Best regards,

Nandesh Kumar Arasappa

P.S. : Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 18/2/15, sundarrajan kumaraswamy <ksra...@gmail.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [MW:22905] Excess penetration measurment in Radiograph
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 18 February, 2015, 11:25 PM


Yes, I agree with your Radiography
image, but ASME B 31.3 acceptance criteria is only for
Visual Inspection not forRadiography image,
moreover ball passing test is not specified in ASME
standard,
Any idea
about  Image Contrast graph method, Shell DEP has specified
this test procedure for measuring Excess penetration,

Regards,
K.Sundar Rajan
On 18 February 2015 at
14:39, LALU RAJENDRAN <lal...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
My opinion, in DWSI
superimpose, you can see the excess penetration clearly.
Please refer the attached image.
Please refer table 341.3.2 for
acceptance criteria. However as Mr. Jerald mentioned earlier
you can go for ball passing test to confirm the
ID.

regards,LALULINKS MIDDLE EASTABU DHABI, UAE

On
Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:19 AM, sundarrajan kumaraswamy <ksra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
  How to measure the excess
penetration from the Radiograph of Small bore piping 
DWDI superimpose Radiograph shows low density near the inner
wall,what is acceptance criteria for excess
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAALHs9OvDJrY4mr-gHTH0U0GscJ4cvV5bXRDG87qLdSWtixGBA%40mail.gmail.com.

pkkani...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 20, 2015, 10:32:15 PM2/20/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sundar ,

I believe all have given their input and the good one is to do UT or you can go for gauge pigging which could help u to understand if it is excess or not.

Regards
Pratish 


On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 1:49:32 AM UTC+5:30, sundarrajan kumaraswamy wrote:

sundarrajan kumaraswamy

unread,
Feb 21, 2015, 12:06:14 PM2/21/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Pratish,

UT measurement on small bore piping is very difficult , more over probe seating on weld is impossible
so please suggest how to measure weld excess penetration by UT

Any idea about Image Contrast Graph,

Regards,

K.Sundar Rajan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.

Prashun Kumar

unread,
Feb 21, 2015, 11:09:30 PM2/21/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Excess penentration is measured edge of the joint to base metal in superimposed method by scale.
 
Regards,
 
Prashun

sundarrajan kumaraswamy

unread,
Feb 24, 2015, 10:27:14 PM2/24/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

Any idea about Image Contract Graph, In Shell Dep mentioned about excess penetration measurement by Image contrast graph,

Regards,

K.Sundar Rajan

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages