PAUT Instead of RT

163 views
Skip to first unread message

williams p wilson

unread,
Oct 11, 2022, 3:50:08 AM10/11/22
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Experts,

Please guide, RT can be replaced with PAUT for a vessel constructed with ASME Section VIII Div.1, MOC : SA 516 Gr.70, 70 / 80 mm Thickness.

Thank You & Regards
Williams P Wilson
QA/QC Engineer
Please consider the environment before printing this message

Raghuram Bathula

unread,
Oct 11, 2022, 4:05:47 AM10/11/22
to Materials-Welding
yes, refer UW (51(a)(4)

anthony chundal

unread,
Oct 11, 2022, 6:37:32 AM10/11/22
to material...@googlegroups.com
Yes it can be done

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHBxnQ5hNvmec_a_qxOBGp66-DVsdUR7mT3WHOvS-%3DKX_dq4vg%40mail.gmail.com.

srinivas rao

unread,
Oct 11, 2022, 11:32:51 PM10/11/22
to Materials & Welding
PAUT can be used in place of  RT and allowed as per ASME SEC VIII DIV 1, check your weld quality before jumping to this mecthod and it is  better than RT and with more precision to detect defects. However  you need check with your NDT crew or your NDT sub contractors are they having compitent personal to perfrom  it is very important that the person who is  perfrom this shall be skilled enoughed to operate machines for  performing & interpreting results and all the welds in the vessel cannot have sufficient space on either side of the welds for scanning and hence interpretation of results may be difficult in case proper calibration and validation blocks are not place.

please refer ASME Code cases that are allowing  PAUT  in the lieu of RT 

you require to demostrate  PAUT mock up prior to NDE test to your client and AI. no of blocks will differ based on your scope take opion of your LEVEL III.

Thanks 
Rao

williams p wilson

unread,
Oct 13, 2022, 1:34:09 AM10/13/22
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sir,

Thanks for sharing the information.

This job will undergo RN1, SR1 & SR2 - Generally which stage will do the PAUT, No any information from client.


Thank You & Regards
Williams P Wilson
QA/QC Engineer
Please consider the environment before printing this message

srinivas rao

unread,
Oct 13, 2022, 7:05:30 AM10/13/22
to Materials & Welding
if this PQR test coupon No NDE is required  since mechanicla testing will be performed on this coupons .... 
however pls check your client specification that they may insist sam type of NDE will be performed for PQR coupons on case to case basis.
for PQR test coupons do NDE before PWHT and than u can send it fro mechnaicla testing ... confirm the same with your client.

Regards,
Srinivas Rao

srinivas rao

unread,
Oct 13, 2022, 7:05:36 AM10/13/22
to Materials & Welding

 if client is not specified any requiremnt of NDE before or after PWHT , it shall understand that NDT shall be carried out  after PWHT only. 

NDT before PWHT can be avioded based on your confidence over your welding .. to gain convidence before avioding NDT before PWHT you can take 5%  or 10% NDT before PWHT ...

Regards,
Srinivas Rao
On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 9:34:09 AM UTC+4 williamswilsonp wrote:

Sourav Bohrays

unread,
Oct 13, 2022, 7:26:32 AM10/13/22
to material...@googlegroups.com
reason for ndt before any heat treatment are
1.to avoid repair after heat treatment.
2.repair affect quality of weld.makes haz more hard n hard -loss of ductility- chances of BCT .
3.new qualification require to attend repair if job require heat treatment.
4.economical raises cost of welding consumable,heat treatment,production time

Regards
Sourav Bohray

pgos...@rogers.com

unread,
Oct 13, 2022, 2:16:03 PM10/13/22
to material...@googlegroups.com

Hello Williams,

 

Sec VIII, DIV-1 allows PAUT in lieu of RT, subject to the fulfilment of the following clauses. Requirements are well documented. A competent organization, with qualified personnel and similar experiences are the key. Interpretation of PAUT is not very easy, defect sizing and acceptance requires skill. In RT you’re able to see the actual defect size, while in PAUT like any other UT technique it’s all signals.

 

In order to convince the inspector (AI) the actual clauses  and reasons for not doing RT should be well referred in your proposal.

 

Thanks.

 

Pradip Goswami.P.Eng, IWE.

Cell/Whasapp:1-905-9793232

 

 

image005.png
image006.png
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages