can we prepare new PQR with ASME and AWS and EN standard?...

[ghan...@gmail.com]

Dear experts,

can we prepare as PQR based on ASME, AWS, and EN standards?

If yes, then which are the qualifications (limits) and test are differs with respect to ASME standards,

Kindly do needful.

Mohammed Ghani

[george....@gr.bureauveritas.com]

please be more specific

best regards

Dr. Georgios Dilintas

Authorized Nuclear Inspector
Authorized Inspector Supervisor

I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER
BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE

Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5
Fax: +30 210 40 63 118
Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04


ghanicwi---26/01/2015 14:25:59---Dear experts, can we prepare as PQR based on ASME, AWS, and EN standards?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/aa3f596a-d24d-4b0b-afef-3a90f5a67e93%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com

[Mohammed Ghani]

Dear sir,

I have to prepare a single PQR using ASME, AWS and EN 15614. can we prepare such PQR ?

if yes, please let me know which are the main points need to considered. like (thickness, P Number, Group Number, Impact testing). which code is more stringent?

also if possible, refer a code. 

Kindly do needful.

Thanks and regards,

Mohammed Ghani.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/OFDDF5C395.1D8EBCE1-ONC2257DD9.004BF9CD-C2257DD9.004C0135%40LocalDomain.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Thanks and Regards, ?

Mohammed Ghani,

CSWIP 3.1 / BGAS L-2 / ISO 9001:2008 QMS LA.

Mechanical Inspector,

BUREAU VERITAS.

ü Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 "Be the change you wish to see in the world"

---Mahatma Gandhi---

[Umar Rashid Makrani]

Dear Abdul Ghani,

Make a list of all essential variables, testing requirements and acceptance criteria, check whether single testing can be done? if not you may have to create multiple samples (make sure you weld a coupon big enough). now weld the coupon as per required size and test according to multiple code/standard requirements and prepare multiple Records. Good Luck.

Please update the forum about the results.

Expect the experts to comments.

 

With Best Regards,
Umar Rashid Makrani, PMP® ,

NACE CIP-2, LEEA Registered Engineer.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAG7AWVgs55oievajxW%3D%2BaUmUciCv%2B-cmKy%2BJF-wtOFSNjWmyWw%40mail.gmail.com.

[c sridhar]

EN 15614 is more stringent followed by ASME and AWS in order.  

Type and no. tests depend up on material thickness and other 

variable parameters.

Towards AWS, you can  use ASME  PQR as a pre approved document also.

But, U could be more specific .

C Sridhar.

Technical Adviser - Welding,
for Alsta Pristine Engineering Private Limited,. Bangalore
( SS, AL fabricators & A venture of Advance Eng. Training & Inspection Services). Chennai,

Mobile nos: 0 94449 71097, 0 7406 326326, 0 94445 21267.

Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save the environment.

---

 

---

From: Umar Rashid Makrani <firoz....@gmail.com>
To: "material...@googlegroups.com" <material...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 26 January 2015 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [MW:22762] can we prepare new PQR with ASME and AWS and EN standard?...

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJCSKyjn48Yq5jSqjBybfEUbdzZuAfaX%2B%3DCQ3RR4hUAz1CmxFg%40mail.gmail.com.

[Vijay....@akersolutions.com]

Hi,

Prepare the Gap analysis covering all the essential & non-essential parameters. Highlight the difference as stated in below emails.

It is not recommended to say which code is more stringent than the other. Please be specific with your application and type of testing the weld joint requires for particular operating and design temperature and load.

 

Consider the attached files as reference for preparing Gap analysis. This is prepared for “Norsok M101 against AWS D1.1”. (Note: Norsok M101 is application guidelines, based on EN 15614-1.)

 

Rgds

Vijay Tayade.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/1994458067.639851.1422383729738.JavaMail.yahoo%40mail.yahoo.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

This e-mail and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and any attachments permanently from your system.

[gprak...@gmail.com]

Good analysis. Thnks for sharing. Agree that there is no question of stringent between stds. Each has some basis and needs to be complied

Rgds
Prakash. G.
Independent Consultant. ASME/ISO/PED

From: Vijay....@akersolutions.com Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2015 12:06 To: material...@googlegroups.com Reply To: material...@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [MW:22768] can we prepare new PQR with ASME and AWS and EN standard?...

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/751ab7188cb643e2b126bcc0cca38697%40hcb-mmsx07.no.enterdir.com.