FORM QW-483 SUGGESTED FORMAT - Tests Conducted by .........
25 views
Skip to first unread message
David Chris
Apr 15, 2024, 12:20:16 AM4/15/24
to Materials & Welding
For the "FORM QW-483 SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION RECORDS PQR", I've had a disagreement with our client / owners during the WPS/PQR review.
Towards the end of the suggested format where it says "Tests Conducted by _____XXXXXXXXXXXX______"; are we supposed to fill in the name of
(1) PIC/QC Engineer/Main Overseer of the PQR from the 'Organization' company (the one who decided on the test coupon size, thickness, electrode, current, amp, WPS, etc. (often our/Organization QC Manager or Senior QC Engineer);
OR
(2) the Person who conducted the Mechanical Testing (Bend, Tensile, macro, hardness, etc.). For (2), the Testing is often done by multiple technicians from 1 testing laboratory, or a different laboratory for NDT (if conducted),or different laboratory for special test (outside the ASME IX testing requirements). So, there often isn't a specific singular person for all the NDT and Destructive testing.
What is supposed to be filled there?
Towards the end of the suggested format where it says "Tests Conducted by _____XXXXXXXXXXXX______"; are we supposed to fill in the name of
(1) PIC/QC Engineer/Main Overseer of the PQR from the 'Organization' company (the one who decided on the test coupon size, thickness, electrode, current, amp, WPS, etc. (often our/Organization QC Manager or Senior QC Engineer);
OR
(2) the Person who conducted the Mechanical Testing (Bend, Tensile, macro, hardness, etc.). For (2), the Testing is often done by multiple technicians from 1 testing laboratory, or a different laboratory for NDT (if conducted),or different laboratory for special test (outside the ASME IX testing requirements). So, there often isn't a specific singular person for all the NDT and Destructive testing.
What is supposed to be filled there?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages