My friends,Can anyone help me to clarify what is diffirent between copper inclusion & tungsten inclusion. Is copper caused of cracking & not permitted but Is Tungsten permitted following code?Which one welding process appear defect like this. thanks for your help.--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
dear friend
the fillerwire will have copper for good arc initiation ,while welding it may incur into the weld pool and stay as metallic inclusion .the copper has low melting temperature ,while solidifying of weld pool,this inclusion will form as a liquid layer called solidification crack which is a major issue on that welding .this will occur in GMAW
In TIG welding process the tungsten from the electrode may melt and drops into the weld pool it will create tungsten inclusion
To be more more precise, Code is distinguishing between rounded and elongated indications.
So, both copper and tungsten inclusions are to be treated as either rounded or elongated indications.
In which chapter Div. 2 is not accepting at all tungsten inclusions? I would be happy to know...
Cooper inclusions could be more harmful than tungsten inclusions
This message contains confidential information. To know more, please click on the following link: http://disclaimer.bureauveritas.com