Hi, Please find below my suggestions as marked in RED. 1) Does this shop need to have ASME "U" Stamp? - No need. (UG-11 (b) )
2) Do we require a Partial Data Report from this Manufacturing Unit duly signed by Autorised Inspector? - No need.Manufacturer of the
part shall furnish identification in accordance with UG-93. You have to certify the Dish end as you are the U stamp holder and manufacturer as per (UG-11 (b) ) and UG-79 and submit the report and related documents to AI for acceptance. 3) Do we require this Manufacturing Unit to be Approved by requesting them to submit Pre-Approval Document? - As per your Quality System.
4) What all min. Documents are required to be submitted in accordance to ASME Sec VIIII Div 1. -
If for dish end only means,Material certificates,Dimension Reports,If
there is any Heattreatment applicable...Heat treatment report etc.,
If for the Whole vessel,it will be as per your quality manual and ASME Sec.VIII,Div.1-Appendix-10,10-3 (Record Retension) 5) The Contract for this Vessel was signed by Client on
June 2010. Can we use ASME Sec VIIII Div 1, 2007 with 2009 Addenda or we
have to follow ASME 2010? - You can use ASME Sec VIIII Div 1, 2007 with 2009 Addenda |
Please do provide relevant Clause from ASME supporting the above Queries.
|
Hope to see as usual opinion. Also someone can share QAP of similar
use.(SA 516 Gr. 70 + Clad , Incolloy 825.) and relevant WPS. - You mean ITP? it shall be prepared by you as per the drawing and scope of work. For WPS..please send the doubts in preparation of WPS.we can assist you. Thanks & Regards, (Karthik) Karthikeyan.S QA/QC Manager Getabec Energy Co.,Ltd. 379,Moo6,Soi8,Nikhomphatana, Rayong-21180, Thailand. Phone: 0066 38 897035-8 (Off) Fax: 0066 38 897034 Hand Phone: 0066 892512282 --- On Fri, 1/21/11, Vino Varghese <vinopv...@gmail.com> wrote: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, Please find below my suggestions as marked in RED. 1) Does this shop need to have ASME "U" Stamp? - No need. (UG-11 (b) )
|
2) Do we require a Partial Data Report from this Manufacturing Unit duly signed by Autorised Inspector? - |
No need.Manufacturer of the part shall furnish identification in accordance with UG-93. PDR would be required if the heads are not in single piece. |
You have to certify the Dish end as you are the U stamp holder and manufacturer as per (UG-11 (b) ) and UG-79 and submit the report and related documents to AI for acceptance.
3) Do we require this Manufacturing Unit to be Approved by requesting them to submit Pre-Approval Document? - As per your Quality System.
4) What all min. Documents are required to be submitted in accordance to ASME Sec VIIII Div 1. - If for dish end only means,Material certificates,Dimension Reports,If there is any Heattreatment applicable...Heat treatment report etc.,
If for the Whole vessel,it will be as per your quality manual and ASME Sec.VIII,Div.1-Appendix-10,10-3 (Record Retension) |
If there is any tack welding to be done on the heads for lifting hooks etc., the vendor has to provide WPS,PQR & WQR as per ASME Sec.IX for approval to you who has the final authority for applying code stamp on vessels. Please refer U 2(B) (2), whcih states that "Some type of work, such as forming, NDE, & heat treatment, may be performed by others (for welding refer UW-26 & UW31). It is the vessel or part manufacturer responsibility to ensure that all work so perfomed complies with all applicable requirment of this division".
Refer UW-31 (C) last paragraph, which states that " Provided the work done under the provisoins of U2(b), it is not necessary that a subcontractor making such tack welds for a vessel or parts manufacturer be a holder of a code certificate of Authorization. The requirement oF uw-26(d) do not apply to such tack welds." |
Sent from my Hape Buluk®
powered by Sinyal Ancur
Hi, .No need Partial report.The dish head manufacturer shall submit the Suitable WPS/PQR and the Welder qualification records.Also the Welding consumables certificates,NDE reports etc., Pls.refer ASME Sec.VIII,Div-1.UCL. |
To: material...@googlegroups.com
From: DOKKU AJAY <akd...@yahoo.com>
Sent by: material...@googlegroups.com
Date: 01/21/2011 11:32PM
Subject: Re: [MW:9406] ASME Sec VIII, Div 1, Pressure Vessel/ Dish End
This email and any attached files ("Message") may contain confidential and/or privileged information. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you receive this Message in error, inform the sender by reply email, delete the Message and destroy any printed copy. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or copying of this Message or any part thereof is prohibited. Emails are susceptible to alteration. Neither Technip nor any of its affiliates shall be liable for the Message if altered or falsified nor shall they be liable for any damage caused by any virus that might be transmitted with this Message.
From: bas karan Sent: Παρασκευή, 23 Οκτωβρίου 2015 - 11:45 To: Materials & Welding Reply To: material...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [MW:23785] ASME Sec VIII, Div 1, Pressure Vessel/ Dish End |
Then there is no need for PMDR
best regards
Dr. Georgios Dilintas
Authorized Nuclear Inspector
Authorized Inspector Supervisor
I&F REGIONAL TECHNICAL MANAGER
BUREAU VERITAS PIRAEUS - GREECE
Tel: +30 210 40 63 113 /4 /5
Fax: +30 210 40 63 118
Cell: +30 69 44 64 62 04
bas karan ---30/10/2015 15:04:31---Dear George, clad plate complies as per section II Part A specification of SA264.
.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/53acd3bc-210f-41c8-8e73-0cecb4180862%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.[attachment "CERT-3364.15.pdf" deleted by George H Dilintas/GRC/VERITAS]
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/67781E78-FA0D-48AE-A053-FA8909CCF1D9%40gmail.com.
I do agree with Mr. Prakash partially. The initial raised question can be addressed as "Dear Experts" but subsequently its difficult to maintain the same. Just as an Eg: A third person enters the group after the 14th mail conversion, he won't be in a position to understand the last query if its addressed as "Experts". He might have to run through all the previous conversations. Further, the person who raises the query directly can response if a clarification against his query is required else if it is addressed as "Experts", he might get lost or could get unnoticed. I think the exchange of forum to individual is OK and should be seen in a lighter note. That's my opinion.
Regards, Vino
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAOUP4qJnqhU-daz6osrswiUYuQ2fpgFmq2FDG9GOtZ866Zg7ug%40mail.gmail.com.