--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/434548542.6153632.1456044675941.JavaMail.yahoo%40mail.yahoo.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/000801d16cf0%2435111d80%249f335880%24%40denney1.freeserve.co.uk.
Seems to me that it was tested above the minimum specified yield strength of the base material (over pressured) because there is a lot of deformation visible on the picture, if material/weld failures were present in general you will get a brittle fracture. Radiographic examination makes only sense if the present fracture surface shows any indication which may relate to an improper longitudinal weld.
I would suggest checking base material certificate (also check wall thickness with requirements) and execute some tests on the uninfluenced base material in order to check if values comply with the certificate.
Also check calibration of equipment used during testing, was it giving the correct information?
Also important to know is the procedure followed during testing. For example in which steps was the test pressure applied, and was the temperature of the water / material during testing.
Met vriendelijke groeten / Best Regards,
Herman Pieper
QA-QC Inspector / CSWIP + IWI-C Welding Inspector / IWT / Materials Expert
Job van der Havestraat 6
8384 DB, Wilhelminaoord
Cell: +31 6 51691215
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/2051398195.6417657.1456127671999.JavaMail.yahoo%40mail.yahoo.com.