De hydrogenition heat treatment for 5Cr material

58 views
Skip to first unread message

biju

unread,
Aug 3, 2015, 12:09:17 AM8/3/15
to Materials & Welding
Our client spec. requires 5Cr material with thickness more than 10mm requires dehydrogenition heat treatmnet 
But the contractor has welded and immediately completed PWHT without going for DHT, Is that acceptable

shanmuganathan .subbiah

unread,
Aug 3, 2015, 5:39:56 AM8/3/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear 
It is not acceptable , Post heat shall be carried as per approved WPS

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:01 AM, biju <biju...@gmail.com> wrote:
Our client spec. requires 5Cr material with thickness more than 10mm requires dehydrogenition heat treatmnet 
But the contractor has welded and immediately completed PWHT without going for DHT, Is that acceptable

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/6c6af4e1-2a5b-4a8f-9aab-993accc61023%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

Regards

SHANMUGANATHAN SUBBIAH
AIB- Vincotte International & Partners LLC

PO.Box-420, PC -116

MAF, Sultanate of Oman

Tel: +968 24565771

Fax: +968 24565772

Mob: +968 92096714

Web:www.vincotte.com

Kannayeram Gnanapandithan

unread,
Aug 3, 2015, 9:29:40 AM8/3/15
to materials-welding
not required and it is not essential variable, since pwht is taken immediately after completion of weld is more than enough 

THANKS & BEST REGARDS,
KG.PANDITHAN, IWE,  AWS-CWI, CSWIP 3.1,
CONSULTANT-WELDING & QUALITY

james gerald

unread,
Aug 3, 2015, 9:57:42 AM8/3/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
 Not Required.  The reason for dehydrogenation treatment by raising the temperature to 250-300 degC is that hydrogen atoms are mobile and have more diffusivity which will drive the hydrogen out of the weldment depending on holding time 1-3 hours.

Not a good practice to avoid dehydrogenation treatment. In this case since PWHT was done immediately, it would have resulted in diffusion of hydrogen from the weldment and thus avoids delayed cracking.

Since this is a client specification violation, may be taking a RT after 48 hours may be a chance to convince the client.


 
Thanks & Regards
J.Gerald Jayakumar
0091-9344954677


From: Kannayeram Gnanapandithan <kgpan...@gmail.com>
To: materials-welding <material...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [MW:23258] De hydrogenition heat treatment for 5Cr material

Jay Poojary

unread,
Aug 4, 2015, 3:18:09 AM8/4/15
to material...@googlegroups.com

Hi Mr. Biju,

With due respect to all the experts comments, My question is how you qualified your procedure,  the same should be followed through out the project. Did you not considered the spec while establishing procedure.

I agree with the comment that it's a non essential variable. But WPS has to be revised.


Thanks & regards,

Jay Poojary
QA/QC Engineer,
OCLLC,  Nigeria

Zeghanu Gigi

unread,
Aug 4, 2015, 3:37:42 AM8/4/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jay,

If the your  approved client spec.required dehydrogenation treatment,you have to respect it(mandatory!).Therefore WPS to be qualified including DHT.

Regards

GIGI ZEGHEANU

WELDING ENGINEER


From: Jay Poojary <jayo...@gmail.com>
To: material...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 4 August 2015, 9:55
Subject: Re: [MW:23262] De hydrogenition heat treatment for 5Cr material

Shashank Vagal

unread,
Aug 4, 2015, 4:49:02 AM8/4/15
to material...@googlegroups.com
That's correct, I agree with Jay; a revision in WPS is required and thererafter to work as per it.
 
BR,
Shashank C Vagal 




Sent: Tuesday, 4 August 2015 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [MW:23262] De hydrogenition heat treatment for 5Cr material

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages