karen read case - the taillight bulbs

[Peteri Szerlagi]

https://x.com/BoozeyBeauty/status/1899365999767400609

finally someone gets around to this

what did they find? dont know - have not watched the video yet

[Peteri Szerlagi]

https://youtu.be/kbZc2PBvLNA?si=H0bS0sEcDfOwW8v1

a comment from 4 days ago

The force needed to break the red lense is not the important, and
case-ending, point of the video. What REALLY matters is that if the
CLEAR DIFFUSER was broken and left at 34 Fairview as the CW claims,
then the video of Karen leaving Meadows Ave would show NO light at
all! So, even the CW's doctored video proves that the CLEAR DIFFUSER
INSIDE THE TAILLIGHT WAS INTACT when Karen left Meadows Ave after
hitting the Traverse. THAT is the case-cracking "smoking gun." If the
diffuser was intact, thus allowing light to shine in the Meadows Ave
video, then someone had to have removed it and planted it at 34
Fairview AFTER Karen hit the Traverse. In other words, the CW's own
video of Karen leaving Meadows Ave PROVES that the clear pieces of
plastic were planted, and it proves it definitively. Sure, the video
also shows that John's arm didn't break the light, but that is not
what is so powerful about the video. What is powerful, and completely
and definitively devastating to the CW's case, is that the CLEAR
PLASTIC WAS STILL INTACT, and thus NOT sitting on the ground in pieces
at 34 Fairview. Karen was framed, and this fact proves it beyond any
doubt.

==================

still trying to digest all of this info

karen read - canton mass - police corruption - john o'keefe