Peteri Szerlagi
unread,Nov 15, 2023, 9:26:46 AM11/15/23Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to sm...@googlegroups.com, mass...@googlegroups.com, usafire, sonofrcma, firerad2, main...@googlegroups.com, sm...@groups.io
lets do a followup 10 years later
the most likely scenario imho was that 153.89 was used to relay
traffic from 158.85 back to the dispatch center
the only problem would be that a portable radio on 158.85 would need
to be stronger into the remote receiver site than the signal from the
dispatcher on 158.85 into the remote receiver site - (if the portable
needed to shout over the dispatcher in an emergency situation) -
otherwise the system would work great and there would be no need for
portables to manually switch to 166.25 when in a dead spot on 158.85