Lucee 4.5.1.000 Error (java.lang.SecurityException) | |
Message | Prohibited package name: java |
Cause | java.lang.SecurityException |
Java Stacktrace | Prohibited package name: java |
Igal Sapir
Lucee Core Developer
Lucee.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lucee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lucee+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lu...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/b1a4077c-428f-4c18-9e4f-42bb4a691170%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/556D007D.8090304%40lucee.org.
Whilst the explanation makes sense, its not really acceptable to impose directory naming limitations because of the underlying class structure, which a cfml dev may have no knowledge of.
This is really a bug, Lucee should have a way of dealing with this.Why can't lucee prefix every package name with something to prevent this.
I'm not suggesting it should have been anticipated by the Lucee/Railo devs, nor that it's not an edge-case that ought to have been anticipated, but it's a design bug in the way the implementation has been done. IMO, natch.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/CAB%3DtfTogq237B27hhX7wvTwirmqDL_r249FnMyyeU_AnkjT9EA%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/556DC724.5060400%40lucee.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/CAG1WijXMLQqhxkEXUQTT703xcaGtK5XGVgKLhPhoUSO1fNYodQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/CAB%3DtfTogq237B27hhX7wvTwirmqDL_r249FnMyyeU_AnkjT9EA%40mail.gmail.com.