<:script> mail=evaluate(url.mail); </:script> <:if hasMail> <:mail subject=mail.subject from=mail.from to=mail.to> <:output>#mail.body#</:output> </:mail> </:if>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lucee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lucee+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lu...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/34d81cb5-a2da-4cb3-9c1e-e72c8d1f4ef1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
it looks maybe odd to you, because it is new what makes it also special.
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 12:13:21 UTC+1, Micha wrote:it looks maybe odd to you, because it is new what makes it also special.Don't be patronising Micha.I assure you namespacing on tags is neither new nor special to me.
I am just unaware of a precedent of vendors with their own tagsets opting to use an empty namespace. I my own hack-about code? Sure. But as an "official" usage? Nope.
Hence the question.--Adam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lucee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lucee+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lu...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/9ec6007e-6ab6-449b-a4e0-76a1bcd71089%40googlegroups.com.
I am just unaware of a precedent of vendors with their own tagsets opting to use an empty namespace. I my own hack-about code? Sure. But as an "official" usage? Nope.My pointHence the question.
My view on this was based on what I saw as the options:
1. No name space, which I really didn't like as i felt it conflicted with say html tags and it felt wrong I think people like the visual seperation and context.
2. a lucee name space is more to type and the file already has .lucee
3. a shorter name space ?
The reason I really like <:output>#Header</:output> is that it allows at a glance for me to easly visually scan
<:output>
<h1>#args.header#</h1>
<ui:thumbnail image="#args.image#" />
<:/output>
HTML vs core vs imported namespace
I like it
A