5.0.0.44 has *neither* createComponent() or loadComponent()?

[Adam Cameron]

G'day:

I just tried this code on 5.0.0.44:

<cfscript>

o = loadComponent("C");

</cfscript>

This gave an error:

Lucee 5.0.0.44 Error (expression)
Message	No matching function [LOADCOMPONENT] found
Stacktrace	The Error Occurred in C:\apps\lucee\5.0\express\webapps\ROOT\shared\scratch\blogExamples\lucee\5\cfcs\loadcomponent\usingLoadComponent.cfm: line 2  1: <cfscript> 2: o = loadComponent("C"); 3: </cfscript>

So I changed the code back to this:

<cfscript>

o = createComponent("C");

</cfscript>

And now I get this error:

Lucee 5.0.0.44 Error (expression)
Message	No matching function [CREATECOMPONENT] found
Stacktrace	The Error Occurred in C:\apps\lucee\5.0\express\webapps\ROOT\shared\scratch\blogExamples\lucee\5\cfcs\loadcomponent\usingLoadComponent.cfm: line 2  1: <cfscript> 2: o = createComponent("C"); 3: </cfscript>

Micha, have you taken your ball and gone home? ;-)

-- 

Adam

[Michael Offner]

We changed it to ObjectNew, JavaNew and WebservuceNew, will update the wiki asap and in the Lucee reference you will find it. (/lucee/doc.cfm)

Micha

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lucee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lucee+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lu...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lucee/848c16e7-ff2e-4116-bbce-583d3458384b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Adam Cameron]

On Saturday, 18 April 2015 19:36:35 UTC+1, Micha wrote:

We changed it to ObjectNew, JavaNew and WebservuceNew, 

Wot, is Yoda on your team or something? ;-)

Should be javaObjectNew(), surely? It's not returning a new Java (whatever that might be). But it should not be any of these. They're really "not excellent" (that's the new "positive" me. I hope you like it).

Did this come from someone's observation about structNew() / queryNew() etc? I don't think the analogy extends to these kind of functions, but I never bothered to comment as I thought those names would never wash. Dammit.

I'll follow-up later.

-- 

Adam