I seem to have solved a simple test problem—uniaxial tension of a flat specimen with failure—using the aforementioned method.
*** I'm using LS-Dyna and Polyumod 2022.
I'm seeing some issues:
1. When using the TNV model, LS-Dyna doesn't record, or records incorrectly, deformations and displacements for the entire model.
That is, zero values are returned if I try to plot graphs and then write the values to a file.
2. Visualization issues:
- Visualization of the deformed model is possible before resolution, but if I try to display deformations or displacements for a single point, all values will be zero.
- After failure begins, visualization of the ENTIRE model is impossible.
Despite the lack of deformation and displacement results in the database, the calculation itself—up until failure—results in a realistic model (like a full-scale experiment and the results of calculating and calibrating the constants).
*** I have some assumptions/hypotheses:
When solving problems, LS-Dyna incorrectly records the values of some variables for this model in the database or records them in a way that the postprocessor "doesn't see."
The stress graphs constructed from LS-Dyna calculations are very similar to reality.
I solved the same model using an abacus—the calculation results are very similar.
when the destruction of elements begins, the integration time step decreases by 15 orders of magnitude