Explosive that cover all S-ALE space

78 views
Skip to first unread message

Eray KILIÇ

unread,
Mar 29, 2022, 10:39:31 AM3/29/22
to ls-d...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

I am doing an explosive analysis using S-ALE, Constrained Lagrange in Solid for coupling. My model has solid and shell elements. My solver is R13. 

After explosive detonation, fluid structure interaction works fine at the very beginning. But after some time, explosive suddenly fills all S-ALE space. Then all elements are deleted with negative volume error as a result of instantaneous increase in the pressure. I could not find where the problem is.

I would be most grateful if you help. 

Sincerely,

Eray Kilic

James M. Kennedy

unread,
Mar 29, 2022, 11:22:30 AM3/29/22
to Eray KILIÇ, ls-d...@googlegroups.com

Dear Anton,

 

The LS-DYNA ALE/FSI package is widely used in studying structures under

blast loading.  Generally, the ALE mesh is necessarily unstructured to

accommodate complex geometries; however, for simple rectilinear geo-

metries, a structured, logically regular, mesh can be utilized.  Recogni-

tion of the latter case leads to algorithmic simplifications, memory

reductions, and performance enhancements, which are impossible in un-

structured mesh geometries.  The new S-ALE solver is easy to use,

especially for users acquainted with the ALE solver.  Only two new

keywords are introduced: *ALE_ STRUCTURED_MESH and *ALE_STRUCTURED_MESH

_CONTROL_POINTS.  The former is used to generate the mesh and invokes

S-ALE solver, and the latter is to provide mesh spacing information

along each local directions.  Other ALE keywords remain the same:

 

Chen, H, and Do, I., "Recent Developments in LS-DYNA S-ALE", 15th

International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, June, 2018.

 

https://www.dynalook.com/15th-international-ls-dyna-conference/fsi-ale/recent-developments-in-ls-dyna-r-s-ale

 

The study presented in this paper compared the newer Structured ALE

(S-ALE) method of blast system simulation to that of the traditional

ALE method.  The S-ALE method has the computational advantage compared

to the ALE and is promising in blast simulation where computational time

is the significant cost and a robust and reliable reduced order modeling

need be established:

 

Babu, V., Kulkarni, K., Kankanalapalli, S., Khatib-Shahidi, V., and

Vunnam, M., "Comparative Analysis of Occupant Responses between LS-DYNA

Arbitrary Lagrange in Euler (ALE) and Structured-ALE (S-ALE) METHODS",

15th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, June,

2018.

 

https://www.dynalook.com/15th-international-ls-dyna-conference/fsi-ale/comparative-analysis-of-occupant-responses-between-ls-dyna-r-arbitrary-lagrange-in-euler-and-ale-and-structured2013ale-s-ale-methods

 

Short tutorials for S-ALE

 

Chen, H., "LS-DYNA Structured ALE (S-ALE) Solver: Mesh Generation and

Input Setup", Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore,

California, (undated publication).

 

https://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/hao/sale/tutorials/S-ALE_Solver_1.pdf

 

Chen, H., “On Setting up a 2D Structured ALE Model”, Livermore Software

Technology Corporation, Livermore, California, (undated publication).

 

https://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/hao/sale/tutorials/Structured%20ALE%20Tutorial%204.pdf

 

examples of S-ALE models

 

http://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/hao/sale/models/

 

Sincerely,

James M. Kennedy

KBS2 Inc.

March 29, 2021

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LS-DYNA2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ls-dyna2+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ls-dyna2/CAOgOP%3D96ioYTHnwOm%2Be2GzHRnW%2BmdB8U5dnVi8_WMh%2BBbdFjcA%40mail.gmail.com.

James M. Kennedy

unread,
Mar 31, 2022, 6:32:29 PM3/31/22
to Eray KILIÇ, ls-d...@googlegroups.com

Dear Ersay,

 

---------------------------------

 

An earlier note:

 

Three numerical models were established in LSDYNA, using either Mat_Elastic_Fluid, Mat_Null

with an Equation of State, and Mat_ALE_Incompressible_Fluid for describing the CSF. For a fair

comparison, an Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) discretization was used for all models:

 

Klug, C., Sinz, W., Brenn, G., and Feist, F., “Experimental SphereinSphere Testing for the Valid-

ation of a Numerical Cerebrospinal Fluid Model”, Paper IRC-13-53, 2013 International Research

Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, September,

2013.

 

http://www.ircobi.org/wordpress/downloads/irc13/pdf_files/53.pdf

 

The computation of fluid forces acting on a rigid or deformable structure constitutes a major problem

in fluid- structure interaction. However, the majority of numerical tests consists in using two different

codes to separately solve pressure of the fluid and structural displacements. In this paper, a monolithic

with an ALE formulation approach was used to implicitly calculate the pressure of an incompressible

fluid applied to the structure. The projection method proposed by Gresho was used to decouple the

velocity and pressure:

 

Aquelet, N., and Souli, M., "ALE Incompressible Fluid in LS-DYNA", 9th European LS-DYNA

Users Conference, Manchester, United Kingdom, May, 2013.

http://www.dynalook.com/9th-european-ls-dyna-conference/ale-incompressible-fluid-in-ls-dyna

The computation of fluid forces acting on a rigid or deformable structure constitutes a major problem

in fluid- structure interaction. However, the majority of numerical tests consists in using two different

codes to separately solve pressure of the fluid and structural displacements. In this paper, a monolithic

with an ALE formulation approach was used to implicitly calculate the pressure of an incompressible

fluid applied to the structure. The projection method proposed by Gresho was used to decouple the

velocity and pressure:


Aquelet, N., and Souli, M., "ALE Incompressible Fluid in LS-DYNA", 12th International LS-DYNA

Users Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, June, 2012.

http://www.dynalook.com/international-conf-2012/fsi-ale23-e.pdf

The computation of fluid forces acting on a rigid or deformable structure constitutes a major problem

in fluid- structure interaction. However, the majority of numerical tests consists in using two different

codes to separately solve pressure of the fluid and structural displacements. In this paper, a monolithic

with an ALE formulation approach was used to implicitly calculate the pressure of an incompressible

fluid applied to the structure. The projection method proposed by Gresho was used to decouple the

velocity and pressure:

 

Souli, M., "ALE Incompressible Fluid in LS-DYNA", 11th International LS-DYNA  Users Conference,

Dearborn, Michigan, June, 2010.

http://www.dynalook.com/international-conf-2010/FluidFSI-5.pdf

 

---------------------------------

 

ALE and FSI

 

In this seminar, you receive comprehensive information directly from one of the program developers

about the latest developments of the features provided by the solver LS-DYNA to analyse fluids and,

in particular, the fluid-structure interaction using its Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) capabilities.

 

https://www.dynamore.de/en/training/seminars/multiphysics-biomechanics/ale-and-fsi

 

Kulak, R.F., and Schwer, L.E., "Effect of Soil Material Models on SPH Simulations for Soil-

Structure Interaction", 12th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, Michigan,

June, 2012.

 

http://www.dynalook.com/international-conf-2012/fsi-ale23-d.pdf

 

Souli, M. and Shahrour, I., "A Coupling Method for Soil Structure Interaction Problems",

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 27, Issue 9,

pp. 1140-1153, June, 2013.

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258790896_A_coupling_method_for_soil_structure_interaction_problems

 

The Lagrangian and ALE soil material behavior were represented by the *MAT_005 material

 

Model (data included) in the following paper:

 

Souli, M. and Shahrour, I., "Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Formulation for Soil Structure

Interaction Problems", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering", Vol. 35, pp. 72-79, April,

2012.

 

(10) (PDF) Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulation for soil structure interaction problems (researchgate.net)

 

https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/11283

 

---------------------------------

 

Sincerely,

James M. Kennedy

KBS2 Inc.

March 31, 2022

Hi,

--

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages