Dear Yaha,
-----------------------------------------------
Recommend checking *CONSTRAINED_BEAM_IN_SOLID approach.
*CONSTRAINED_BEAM_IN_SOLID has been implemented. This feature is basically an overhauled constraint coupling between beams and Lagrangian solids that includes features that make it more attractive in some cases than *CONSTRAINED_ LAGRANGE_IN_SOLID, for example, in modeling coupling of rebar in concrete:
Chen, H., “An Introduction to *CONSTRAINED_BEAM_IN_SOLID”, FEA Information Solutions, Vol. 5, Issue 10. pp. 79-83, October, 2016.
http://www.feaiej.com/2017/feaiej_q1_2017.pdf
Solution options for including the initial tension in the tendons (static implicit, transient explicit, and Dynamic Relaxation solutions) and various methods for coupling the tensioned tendons to the concrete (shared nodes, *CONSTRAINED_LAGRANGE_IN_ SOLID, *ALE_COUPLING_NODAL_CONSTRAINT, and *CONSTRAINED_BEAM_ IN_SOLID) were given. The concrete was modeled using *MAT_159 (CSCM) with the default parameters for a concrete with unconfined compressive strength of 41.37 MPa:
Schwer, L.E., "Modeling Pre and Post Tensioned Concrete", 14th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, June, 2016.
Examples of rebar coupled to concrete (*clis and *cbis) are given here:
http://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/support/FAQ_kw/concrete/coupling_by_clis.k.gz and
http://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/support/FAQ_kw/concrete/coupling_by_cbis.k.gz
------------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
James M. Kennedy
KBS2 Inc.
May 26, 2026
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LS-DYNA2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
ls-dyna2+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ls-dyna2/8a011be2-aa2d-4185-be9b-f2cd940cd2fen%40googlegroups.com.