--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LPCalifornia-ExCom-Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lpcalifornia-excom-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lpcalifornia-excom-discuss/CAJaaAt%2BEytLUEo%2BLfiOM_-cocrt4c6Sdi4Ubqv4XyuteSYUAKg%40mail.gmail.com.
I don't disagree but, like the convention calendar, this is an issue that LNC needs to sort out. Our rules should reflect what makes sense for us - especially since they can change their rules at any time.That said we should instruct our LNC delegates to push for consistency at the LNC level.Are there any state affiliates that require their members be residents of that state?MikeSent with Proton Mail secure email.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LPCalifornia Bylaws Committee Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lpcalifornia-bylaws...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lpcalifornia-bylaws-discuss/CAOCnFCDAJD0ETRLNz_Hux-tFVR1tEqX1aS0__jH%2BHK5wXx3Gsw%40mail.gmail.com.
On 2025-12-02 08:16, June Genis wrote:
I note that the national bylaws still allow delegates to be allocated based on people not resident in their state (10.3.1). Since people who become life members in one state and who have moved to a new state do not have the option of being counted by national in their old state this is a bit inconsistent. Perhaps it's time to change this.
The two sets of people are only loosely related -- they could even, in theory, be completely disjoint, since a state could send as their one delegate required to be a resident of that state somebody who is not a national sustaining member.