--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lonergan_L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lonergan_l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/CALaFOMsK0dBnQr88N%3D55y8P2gyTMEhQa4tJhoXZo7hB-1DpB5Q%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/977574774.642474.1686084665303%40mail.yahoo.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/CAJn5Bu_Zo3ysLHRGKmR%3DuZQ4wCi%2Biy5EuENK0MZrTkMeR-2%3DVg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/CAJn5Bu_Zo3ysLHRGKmR%3DuZQ4wCi%2Biy5EuENK0MZrTkMeR-2%3DVg%40mail.gmail.com.
Also Planck, who just wanted the equations to work.Tony, anything in particular of interest from that conference? (I couldn't find any proceedings online.)
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:06 PM Tony <ton...@gmail.com> wrote:Doug,JohnShe does present a case against beauty being a litmus test for reality (Poor Dirac who thought that his antimatter equations were beautiful). Sabine is an on-the-fence agnostic who probably does not want to offend her atheist colleagues. By way of analogy, she fits Vladimir Horowitz 'description of a music critic as someone who could not cut it in the real performing stage.As a counter ,please Google the latest Society of Catholic Scientists conference which was held in Los Alamos NM where there was a discussion of beauty from a Thomistic perspective.Blessings,Tony
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:51 PM 'jaraymaker' via Lonergan_L <loner...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lonergan_L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lonergan_l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/CAJn5Bu_Zo3ysLHRGKmR%3DuZQ4wCi%2Biy5EuENK0MZrTkMeR-2%3DVg%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lonergan_L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lonergan_l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/CALaFOMuzwsjgX3Wmew6DvzR8reVuntrWxH5ukHrtsqmkiiVL8A%40mail.gmail.com.
Von: loner...@googlegroups.com
An: loner...@googlegroups.com
Verschickt: 08.06.2023 07:39:00 W. Europe Standard Time
Betreff: [lonergan_l] Beauty and Existential Physics
This theme brings back to mind Bernard Lonergan's treatment of the transcendentals, the good true and beautiful. Hans Urs von Balthasar devoted a book on beauty. John Dadosky has "diagnosed" this theme. I was led to it by googling. Here are the references:"The Eclipse of Beauty and its Recovery", a paper by John Dadosky that can be found atJohn
Am 08.06.2023 02:29:32 W. Europe Standard Time schrieb doug....@gmail.com:
Also Planck, who just wanted the equations to work.Tony, anything in particular of interest from that conference? (I couldn't find any proceedings online.)
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:06 PM Tony <ton...@gmail.com> wrote:Doug,JohnShe does present a case against beauty being a litmus test for reality (Poor Dirac who thought that his antimatter equations were beautiful). Sabine is an on-the-fence agnostic who probably does not want to offend her atheist colleagues. By way of analogy, she fits Vladimir Horowitz 'description of a music critic as someone who could not cut it in the real performing stage.As a counter ,please Google the latest Society of Catholic Scientists conference which was held in Los Alamos NM where there was a discussion of beauty from a Thomistic perspective.Blessings,Tony
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:51 PM 'jaraymaker' via Lonergan_L <loner...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Interesting topic. I suppose, Doug, you're referring to Sabine Hossenfelders a German theoretical physicist, science communicator, author, musician. She is indeed a multi-talented person. One can read the followng appraisals of her Existential Physics on the Net, e. g.
The most surprising and interesting feature of the book is the claim that many of her physicist peers are as guilty of bringing speculation and belief into their scientific thinking as theologians and New Age mystics . . . Existential Physics is an informed and entertaining guide to what science can and cannot tell us. If Ms. Hossenfelder is sometimes a little too opinionated, the reader will quickly forgive her. Anyone capable of bridging the concerns of the human world and the baffling complexities of physics has earned the right to be indulged a little.”
—The Wall Street Journal
John
I've posted before about Sabine's view on beauty and mathematics, where she questions the value of `it's beautiful so it must be true'. Her recent book on Existential Physics has an interesting view on whether we'll ever know how the universe was created. She cites Laplace in regard to the "unnecessary hypothesis" and that reminded me of Ockham's Razor. In any case, it turns the tables on a typical criticism of theology that folks invoke the Divine as explanation alongside creation.
Doug.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lonergan_L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lonergan_l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lonergan_l/CALaFOMuzwsjgX3Wmew6DvzR8reVuntrWxH5ukHrtsqmkiiVL8A%40mail.gmail.com.