[PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Use dedicated CPU OPP table for Tanix TX6

29 views
Skip to first unread message

Clément Péron

unread,
Apr 26, 2020, 8:17:14 AM4/26/20
to Maxime Ripard, Chen-Yu Tsai, Rob Herring, linux-ar...@lists.infradead.org, devic...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi, Clément Péron, Piotr Oniszczuk
Tanix TX6 has a fixed regulator. As DVFS is instructed to change
voltage to meet OPP table. The DVFS is not working as expected.

Introduce a dedicated OPP Table where voltage are equals to
the fixed regulator.

Reported-by: Piotr Oniszczuk <war...@o2.pl>
Fixes: add1e27fb703 ("arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Enable CPU opp tables for Tanix TX6")
Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron...@gmail.com>
---
.../sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6-cpu-opp.dtsi | 116 ++++++++++++++++++
.../dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts | 2 +-
2 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6-cpu-opp.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6-cpu-opp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6-cpu-opp.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..062940115563
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6-cpu-opp.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+// Copyright (C) 2020 Clément Péron <peron...@gmail.com>
+
+/ {
+ cpu_opp_table: cpu-opp-table {
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points";
+ nvmem-cells = <&cpu_speed_grade>;
+ opp-shared;
+
+ opp@480000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <480000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@720000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <720000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@816000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@888000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <888000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@1080000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1080000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@1320000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1320000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@1488000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1488000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@1608000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@1704000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1704000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+
+ opp@1800000000 {
+ clock-latency-ns = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
+
+ opp-microvolt-speed0 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed1 = <1135000>;
+ opp-microvolt-speed2 = <1135000>;
+ };
+ };
+};
+
+&cpu0 {
+ operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
+};
+
+&cpu1 {
+ operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
+};
+
+&cpu2 {
+ operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
+};
+
+&cpu3 {
+ operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
index be81330db14f..3eaa4f49e3d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
/dts-v1/;

#include "sun50i-h6.dtsi"
-#include "sun50i-h6-cpu-opp.dtsi"
+#inlcude "sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6-cpu-opp.dtsi"

#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>

--
2.20.1

Clément Péron

unread,
Apr 26, 2020, 8:18:19 AM4/26/20
to Maxime Ripard, Chen-Yu Tsai, Rob Herring, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-sunxi, Piotr Oniszczuk
Hi Warpme,

On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 14:17, Clément Péron <peron...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Tanix TX6 has a fixed regulator. As DVFS is instructed to change
> voltage to meet OPP table. The DVFS is not working as expected.
>
> Introduce a dedicated OPP Table where voltage are equals to
> the fixed regulator.
>
> Reported-by: Piotr Oniszczuk <war...@o2.pl>
> Fixes: add1e27fb703 ("arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Enable CPU opp tables for Tanix TX6")
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron...@gmail.com>

Could you confirm this patch fixed your issue?

If yes could you add your tested-by tag ?

Thanks,
Clement

Clément Péron

unread,
Apr 28, 2020, 4:45:41 AM4/28/20
to Maxime Ripard, Chen-Yu Tsai, Rob Herring, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-sunxi, Piotr Oniszczuk
Hi Maxime,

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 09:52, Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Tanix TX6 has a fixed regulator. As DVFS is instructed to change
> > voltage to meet OPP table. The DVFS is not working as expected.
> >
> > Introduce a dedicated OPP Table where voltage are equals to
> > the fixed regulator.
> >
> > Reported-by: Piotr Oniszczuk <war...@o2.pl>
> > Fixes: add1e27fb703 ("arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Enable CPU opp tables for Tanix TX6")
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron...@gmail.com>
>
> I'm not really a big fan of duplicating the OPPs, since that would make an
> update of those very likely to be overlooked for that particular board (and
> since it's a board that not a lot of people have, it would be harder to notice
> too).
>
> IIRC, removing the cpu-supply property should work as well?
Yes it would works also the OPP will provide a dummy regulator.

But as it has been introduced and there is a cpu regulator in the real life.
I thought it was a bit a hack to just remove it but as you wish.

Regards,
Clement



>
> Maxime
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages