There have been some comments on this list about crash locations and safety concerns. I have been asked by a few individuals if I can share some reference material with them (as I have knowledge of them since these are used in the MPO decision making process). Instead, I have decided to do this general posting to the TMMA list. Here are three of the ways that MassDOT (Massachusetts Department of Transportation) tracks some of these issues that may be of relevance in evaluating Articles that are coming before this Town Meeting. These reports, in general, give rough cut of crash information that can give readers a sense of what recent history shows even with a number of caveats that the information is not complete. I will send three additional email messages that contain more information on each of these.
1. High Crash Location Clusters (“Top 200 list”) for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists: This reporting measure is helpful in that it shows specific location clusters of where crashes occur, thus spotlighting that there may be something intrinsic to that location that might be remedied through intervention of some sort.
Lexington has seven high crash locations in addition to the
Route 2 and Route
128 corridors.
http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/highway/Departments/TrafficAndSafetyEngineering/CrashData/TopCrashLocationsAndMaps
2. MassDOT
Crash Portal Web Site:
The
data
posted on this website, including crash records and other
reports, are
collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or
planning the safety
enhancement of potential crash sites, hazardous roadway
conditions, or
railway-highway crossings. There is an interactive module that
could be used
when trying to obtain a listing of crashes given specific
parameters (for
example, to obtain a listing of crashes occurring at dusk
between June 2007 and
October 2007 which involved a deer in the crash sequence of
events). The output
of this module will be a listing of specific crash reports which
can then be
exported. The Mapping module focuses on located crashes only and
should be used
when trying to obtain either a map of crashes or a listing of
crashes with a
specific geographic location. It can also be used in conjunction
with the Ad Hoc
module so that only crashes meeting specific criteria can be
spatially viewed
and/or listed and mapped.
A complete spreadsheet listing can be easily downloaded directly
from this site
for Lexington crashes for 2010 – 2012 which are the latest
available.
http://services.massdot.state.ma.us/crashportal/
3. The
MassDOT Traffic Office has
compiled a spreadsheet of Top 2007 – 2011 Bike-Ped locations
by various methods
for the Massachusetts Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory
Board:
The
current methodology for determining the top ranked communities
has been to examine
crash test data (which is incomplete) and utilize EMS ambulance
data statewide
(5 measures are included). MassDOT wants to fund and train
police to collect
information on infractions to determine areas in need of
attention. If training
feedback and results are positive, the program would move to
other communities.
MassDOT would also like to measure policy objectives, such as
measuring mode shift
changes from increased safety efforts.
The results show that Lexington ranks poorly on this suite of
five measures compared
to other Massachusetts communities.
Lexington’s composite score places Lexington as number 15
out of 351
communities (with number 1 as the least “safe”). This is not a statistically
validated
measure, but it gives a general state of where Lexington may
stand.
http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/GreenDOT/HealthyTransportation/MABicycleandPedestrianAdvisoryBoard.aspx
Richard Canale,
Lexington’s designee to the Boston MPO
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/D8C07BE0C15F4644A5243E0AAC51E9C46ADD2AC1%40IST-EX10MBX-2.ad.bu.edu.
--
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/D13F7C06.7BC44%25paul.chernick%40verizon.net.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/D13F7C06.7BC44%25paul.chernick%40verizon.net.
RichardThat is so nice of you to spend your valuable time and provide us information.All of us are looking into health , safety of public specially children's , elderly , pedestrians and tourists who come to see this historical town.Harrington , Bedford street looks like a love triangle - go left or right or straight - always worried about some thing happeningPlease see the picture from the battle green -- close to Harrington street———taken early in the morningWe need compassionate citizenry to figure out how can we improve the safety? Or can we and that is what the long term volunteers and knowledgable people like you and others suggest.Dialogue and debates on issues this and many are true hallmark of democracy so nice that we are all involved — we are also reading the pulse of our constituents—Precinct 6-- and from all of this I am sending my thoughts——I am not in favor of Traffic light at the intersection of Woburn and Mass Avenue as part of Center streetscape project although good thoughts ---Perhaps we need to rethink beauty, history, safety and what is best for allBestThanksDinesh PatelPrecinct 6Dinesh Patel MD
Looks like the Harrington cluster includes more than collisions with car leaving Harrington. Perhaps it includes inattentive drivers coming south on Bedford running into cars that have stopped to allow cars to cross to and from Harrington.
From: Richard Canale <r.ca...@rcn.com>
Reply-To: <r.ca...@rcn.com>
Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 12:21 PM
To: Lex TMMA <lex...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [LexTMMA] Crash Data email 1 of 4
There have been some comments on this list about crash locations and safety concerns. I have been asked by a few individuals if I can share some reference material with them (as I have knowledge of them since these are used in the MPO decision making process). Instead, I have decided to do this general posting to the TMMA list. Here are three of the ways that MassDOT (Massachusetts Department of Transportation) tracks some of these issues that may be of relevance in evaluating Articles that are coming before this Town Meeting. These reports, in general, give rough cut of crash information that can give readers a sense of what recent history shows even with a number of caveats that the information is not complete. I will send three additional email messages that contain more information on each of these.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->1. <!--[endif]-->High Crash Location Clusters (“Top 200 list”) for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists: This reporting measure is helpful in that it shows specific location clusters of where crashes occur, thus spotlighting that there may be something intrinsic to that location that might be remedied through intervention of some sort.
Lexington has seven high crash locations in addition to the Route 2 and Route 128 corridors.
http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/highway/Departments/TrafficAndSafetyEngineering/CrashData/TopCrashLocationsAndMaps
<!--[if !supportLists]-->2. <!--[endif]-->MassDOT Crash Portal Web Site: The data posted on this website, including crash records and other reports, are collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential crash sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings. There is an interactive module that could be used when trying to obtain a listing of crashes given specific parameters (for example, to obtain a listing of crashes occurring at dusk between June 2007 and October 2007 which involved a deer in the crash sequence of events). The output of this module will be a listing of specific crash reports which can then be exported. The Mapping module focuses on located crashes only and should be used when trying to obtain either a map of crashes or a listing of crashes with a specific geographic location. It can also be used in conjunction with the Ad Hoc module so that only crashes meeting specific criteria can be spatially viewed and/or listed and mapped.
A complete spreadsheet listing can be easily downloaded directly from this site for Lexington crashes for 2010 – 2012 which are the latest available.
http://services.massdot.state.ma.us/crashportal/
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]--><!--[if !supportLists]-->3. <!--[endif]-->The MassDOT Traffic Office has compiled a spreadsheet of Top 2007 – 2011 Bike-Ped locations by various methods for the Massachusetts Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Board: The current methodology for determining the top ranked communities has been to examine crash test data (which is incomplete) and utilize EMS ambulance data statewide (5 measures are included). MassDOT wants to fund and train police to collect information on infractions to determine areas in need of attention. If training feedback and results are positive, the program would move to other communities. MassDOT would also like to measure policy objectives, such as measuring mode shift changes from increased safety efforts.
The results show that Lexington ranks poorly on this suite of five measures compared to other Massachusetts communities. Lexington’s composite score places Lexington as number 15 out of 351 communities (with number 1 as the least “safe”). This is not a statistically validated measure, but it gives a general state of where Lexington may stand.
http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/GreenDOT/HealthyTransportation/MABicycleandPedestrianAdvisoryBoard.aspx
Richard Canale,
Lexington’s designee to the Boston MPO
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LexTMMA" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lextmma+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lex...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lextmma.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/55197816.3020507%40rcn.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LexTMMA" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lextmma+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lex...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lextmma.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/D13F7C06.7BC44%25paul.chernick%40verizon.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LexTMMA" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lextmma+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lex...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lextmma.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/E5EC36B2-D4A6-474F-A3AC-4C3C98C8CF01%40me.com.
I am not sure that the data does not also include cars merging from Hancock Street onto Bedford Street towards the center, since that does not seem to have a separate accident listing, and it has plenty of traffic.This winter the view up Bedford St. was often obscured by a large snow drift. Long lines at rush hour cause some people to make the right to cross onto Harrington from Hancock instead of the merge.
The intersection crash cluster analysis method, developed by Geonetics for MassDOT, is a comprehensive method designed to locate crash clusters. At the heart of the method is a 25 meter (82 ft.) fixed search distance around each crash. In basic terms, this radius controls how far the application will search for adjacent crashes. Using a 25 meter radius, the analysis method found nearby crashes and merged their areas together, thus creating clusters. If two distinct clusters are found to share a common crash, the two clusters are merged into a single cluster. This method of search-and-merge results in a set of many distinct clusters of different sizes and shape. The application then stores these clusters to the GIS output file, along with the count of crashes within the cluster. The clusters were then ranked by the number of Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) crashes contained within their boundaries.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "LexTMMA" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lextmma+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lex...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lextmma.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/551B224A.10600%40rcn.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lextmma/5786C463-7F96-4AF9-8EBB-4CDC66536245%40rcn.com.