Congratulations, Félix!
And thank you!
Besides extending Leo into the vastly wider world of millions of VSCoders; painstakingly translating Leo into universal and virtually immortal Javascript/Typescript (thus extending Leo's scriptability, accessible to all non-Pythonistas); your care to separately host and document LeoJS on GitHub gives me hope that your prodigious efforts over the years will not be in vain.
Edward, what a legacy you leave us!
Thank you!
I've followed your pioneering work for over twenty years, and, beyond your programming prowess and intuition, your community leadership is largely responsible for how Leo --and we -- got here today.
Thank you, again.
Paul
- Need help with opening a Leo file - 22 Updates
- 🚀 LeoJS 1.0.6 & Website: Ready for Launch! 🌐 - 2 Updates
rengel <reinhard...@googlemail.com>: Sep 15 10:56PM -0700
I have a leo file stored in 'D:/dev/.leo/Dev.leo'.
When I open this file with Leo (on Windows 10), I get
'@edit D:/dev/.leo/Dev.leo'
in the outline pane while the complete leo file is shown ...more
rengel <reinhard...@googlemail.com>: Sep 15 11:00PM -0700
Maybe I should add a screenshot of the situation:[image: leo.png]
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 7:56:12 AM UTC+2 rengel wrote:
...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 02:32AM -0500
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:56 AM 'rengel' via leo-editor <
> I have a leo file stored in 'D:/dev/.leo/Dev.leo'.
> When I open this file with Leo (on Windows 10), I get
> '@edit ...more
rengel <reinhard...@googlemail.com>: Sep 16 03:38AM -0700
Thanks for your suggestion!
But this is the only node. In its body text it contains hundreds of othe
nodes wrapped in an xml file. So deleting that node would delete all the
contents of this ...more
rengel <reinhard...@googlemail.com>: Sep 16 03:41AM -0700
BTW: Is there a safe way to include "<<...>>" structs in source code in the
body pane? How can Leo be prevented from looking for such structs in the
body pane?
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at ...more
Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 04:32AM -0700
I haven't tried it but Leo has an alternate JSON file format. That ought
to work for the erlang files.
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 6:41:37 AM UTC-4 rengel wrote:
...more
Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 05:02AM -0700
Leo *ought* to be escaping key XML characters like '<' when it imports a
file. If it isn't handling them right, I would consider that to be a bug.
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 7:32:39 AM ...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 07:32AM -0500
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 5:38 AM 'rengel' via leo-editor <
> But this is the only node. In its body text it contains hundreds of othe
> nodes wrapped in an xml file. So deleting that node would ...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 07:38AM -0500
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 5:41 AM 'rengel' via leo-editor <
leo-e...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
BTW: Is there a safe way to include "<<...>>" structs in source code in the
> body pane? How can ...more
rengel <reinhard...@googlemail.com>: Sep 16 05:40AM -0700
Let's see if I can demonstrate this:
Given is the Erlang file 'erlang_test.erl' that I import in a fresh Leo
outline (first image, erlang_test1.png).
Then I change the '@auto' directive to ...more
rengel <reinhard...@googlemail.com>: Sep 16 05:42AM -0700
This is the Erlang test file:
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 2:40:41 PM UTC+2 rengel wrote:
...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 07:49AM -0500
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 7:42 AM 'rengel' via leo-editor <
> This is the Erlang test file:
Thanks. The .erl file contains several lines that look like section
references. Leo should report ...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 07:51AM -0500
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 7:40 AM 'rengel' via leo-editor <
leo-e...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Given is the Erlang file 'erlang_test.erl' that I import in a fresh Leo
> Then I change the '@auto' ...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 06:49AM -0700
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 7:38:18 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 5:41 AM 'rengel' via leo-editor wrote:
BTW: Is there a safe way to include "<<...>>" structs ...more
Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 06:55AM -0700
An @edit file is always considered to be a text file, isn't it? So we're
thinking that an @edit node was created when it should have been something
else, right?
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at ...more
Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 07:05AM -0700
Looking at the test erlang file, I see that the "<< ... >> " syntax seems
to be an essential part. I had at first thought they were symbols that had
not been escaped by the XML ingesting code, but ...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 09:05AM -0500
> An @edit file is always considered to be a text file, isn't it? So we're
> thinking that an @edit node was created when it should have been something
> else, right?
It looks that way, but I ...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 09:45AM -0500
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 9:05 AM Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Looking at the test erlang file, I see that the "<< ... >> " syntax seems
> wonder if the section delineator ...more
rengel <reinhard...@googlemail.com>: Sep 16 10:34AM -0700
So basically that means you can't reliably use Leo's @file nodes for Elixir
adn Erlang source code?
On Monday, September 16, 2024 at 4:46:09 PM UTC+2 Edward K. Ream wrote:
...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 01:10PM -0500
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:34 PM 'rengel' via leo-editor <
> So basically that means you can't reliably use Leo's @file nodes for
> Elixir adn Erlang source code?
Yes, that's what I'm saying. ...more
Jacob Peck <gates...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 02:33PM -0400
Doesn't that kind of defeat the whole purpose of having an outliner?
Strings of the pattern `<<some_token>>` occur with some frequency in bash
scripts as well, for example:
``` ...more
Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 11:50AM -0700
The section marker has to be at the very left of the current indentation
level, doesn't it?
...more
Félix <felix...@gmail.com>: Sep 15 08:51PM -0700
[image: leojs-website-top.png]
📢*LeoJS 1.0.6 is here!*🥳
I'm excited to announce that the latest version of LeoJS comes with some
awesome new features, and a new *dedicated documentation ...more
Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com>: Sep 16 02:29AM -0500
> I'm excited to announce that the latest version of LeoJS comes with some
> awesome new features, and a new *dedicated documentation website* at
> https://boltex.github.io/leojs!
...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to leo-editor+...@googlegroups.com.
Congratulations, Félix!
And thank you!
Besides extending Leo into the vastly wider world of millions of VSCoders; painstakingly translating Leo into universal and virtually immortal Javascript/Typescript (thus extending Leo's scriptability, accessible to all non-Pythonistas); your care to separately host and document LeoJS on GitHub gives me hope that your prodigious efforts over the years will not be in vain.
Edward, what a legacy you leave us!
Thank you!
I've followed your pioneering work for over twenty years, and, beyond your programming prowess and intuition, your community leadership is largely responsible for how Leo --and we -- got here today.
Thank you, again.