I used the for loop to run kneaddata for each sample. But there is one sample whose results are very different:
For comparison, I attached the log file of another sample's output, which is quite "normal".
this sample WGC066623D got four outputs:
WGC066623D_kneaddata.fastq.gz
WGC066623D_kneaddata.trimmed.fastq.gz
WGC066623D_kneaddata_Homo_sapiens_bowtie2_contam.fastq
WGC066623D_kneaddata.log
I am wondering whether the WGC066624 did not contain any human reads at all. Can anyone help to explain a little bit? Thanks