The two object detection examples on the Keras.io site are complicated scripts. One uses transformers and the other retina. If Keras is supposed to be simple and easy, why is there not a simple object detection model listed here?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Keras-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to keras-users...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keras-users/5c439de6-3e03-4762-82e0-0d8f3256f788n%40googlegroups.com.
This is for a very simple reason, the task of object detection with CNNs is itself a complex task, with many pre/post-processing steps required to obtain decent detections, so maybe select a much simpler task to make a good comparison.
Then people would complain that the detection in keras works pretty bad, there is a trade-off between implementation complexity and performance, so you get one or the other, and you can complain in both cases.
On Wednesday, 6 July 2022 17:10:15 CEST Russ Hall wrote:
| What I mean is, could a simple object detection script be included in the
| examples? This would be a script without the "latest and greatest"
| features, just a simple one that works. I did get a Tensorflow Lite Model
| Maker to train yesterday on *my own data*. That wasn't simple, but it was
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Keras-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to keras-users...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keras-users/9cb39ed6-ea5a-46c7-baf4-03da5671a498n%40googlegroups.com.