--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Jupyter" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jupyter+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to jup...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/523B928E-4BC9-47DC-9514-4EB0F5CF3DDE%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/CAH4pYpRTtPDctpRUEpWvQwgbjbDjbz5W8mSDUhZFcYTXEE2Tyg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/B963F274-56C5-4F71-B85A-D6F8217FDD04%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
IPyth...@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
I'll have a look tomorrow.
I'll re-look at the implementation but I think we could even have an even
more generic mixed content manager than takes N contents manager and prefixes
and exposes each of them.
I suppose we could probably try with Scott (IIRC) postgres backend
as an exercise.
--
M
This version **does not** include real-time collaboration. It will need some refactorthat will be done in IPython during the following year. So do expect next versionof jupyterdrive to probably only be compatible with IPython 4.0.
Can you explain what changes in IPython are required for real-time collaboration?
Will the OT happen on the IPython server?
Will it be tied to google-drive?
On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 9:23:09 PM UTC+2, Kester Tong wrote:I'll have a look tomorrow.
I'll re-look at the implementation but I think we could even have an even
more generic mixed content manager than takes N contents manager and prefixes
and exposes each of them.
I suppose we could probably try with Scott (IIRC) postgres backend
as an exercise.I like this idea. It would be slightly more general and consistent than what we currently use. The implementation would be simpler since the first path component will always tell you which content manager to use. Maybe the mixed content manager could be part of IPython? We could test it out in Jupyter Drive first and move it later (still using regular contents manager by default).Kester
--
M
_______________________________________________
IPython-dev mailing list
IPyth...@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Jupyter" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jupyter+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to jup...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/d265e589-ee94-461b-b607-1591bcccd8a7%40googlegroups.com.