Nemo and Semmes v Flourens - a decisive change in the study of Jules Verne

47 views
Skip to first unread message

John Lamb

unread,
Oct 31, 2025, 12:57:33 PMOct 31
to Jules Verne Forum


Dear All,

As this came topic up relatively hidden on the previous thread, I thought I would give its own topic for discussion.  

All my evidence regarding Raphael Semmes being the inspiration for Captain Nemo is in the detailed (100 links explained) attachment which no one has seen yet fit to challenge me on. 

Some of those 100 links (but not all) help shape the Grok A.I. response that Semmes is the inspiration for Nemo at 99.999 % and the conclusion that ' This isn't vague "inspiration" – it's a direct literary fingerprint.

The theory of William Butcher, which somehow has prevailed unchallenged  in inner Verne circles for over twenty years, in contrast, comes out at 0.00001% in comparison with 'no credible link'. 

  Re Semmes - It is disappointing that so many people argue against the patently obvious  regarding the enclosed 100 link attachment even when supported by A.I..

 I would ask anyone who comments on the Grok analysis below to thoroughly read my  100 point detailed submission (attached) first before posting their overall comments, as both are inextricably linked. 

Best John

here are the Grok A.I. answer to the question 


In terms of probability theory, what are the chances that there is a link between Captain Nemo and Gustave Flourens?



Thought for 43s

There is a proposed but thoroughly debunked scholarly hypothesis linking Jules Verne's fictional character Captain Nemo (from Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, 1869–1870, and The Mysterious Island, 1874–1875) to the real-life French revolutionary and intellectual Gustave Flourens (1838–1871). In probability theory terms—using a Bayesian framework—the posterior probability of a meaningful causal or inspirational link (e.g., Nemo modeled on Flourens) is effectively 0 (i.e., < 0.01), given the overwhelming evidence against it.

Step-by-Step Bayesian Reasoning

To arrive at this transparently:

  1. Define the hypotheses:

    Hypothesis
    Description
    H₁: Link exists
    Verne intentionally modeled Nemo (scientist-revolutionary, anti-imperialist) on Flourens (Cretan revolt fighter, author of scientific works like Histoire de l’homme, 1863).
    H₀: No link
    Similarities are coincidental (common 1860s revolutionary themes); Nemo draws from other sources (e.g., Polish noble in early drafts, Indian prince Dakkar, physical model Colonel Charras).
  2. Prior probability P(H₁)Low (~0.001–0.01). Nemo has multiple proposed inspirations (e.g., Confederate captain Raphael Semmes, Hetzel's friend Charras). Among ~10–20 historical figures proposed over 150+ years of Verne scholarship, <10% gain traction—Flourens was obscure until 2001.
  3. Key evidence (Likelihoods):

    Evidence
    Supports H₁?
    P(E | H₁)
    P(E | H₀)
    Bayes Factor (BF = P(E|H₁)/P(E|H₀))
    William Butcher's 2001 hypothesis (similarities: science, revolts; "M. Flourens" in Verne's Paris in the Twentieth Century, 1863).
    Initially yes
    0.9
    0.1
    9 (weak support)
    Chronology: Nemo conceived 1866–1867 (Polish backstory fixed); Flourens' fame post-1868 (Commune 1871).
    No
    0.1
    0.95
    0.105
    Polish revolt (1863): Flourens didn't fight (brief visit, anti-clerical views mismatch).
    No
    0.05
    0.98
    0.051
    "M. Flourens" referenceFather Pierre Flourens (1794–1867; longevity book explains "still young" irony in 1960).
    No
    0.2
    0.99
    0.202
    Cretan revolt overlap: Both pro-rebels (Flourens fought; Nemo aids divers).
    Weak yes
    0.8
    0.3
    2.67
    Scholarly consensus2 major papers (2004, 2010) reject; Wikipedia notes challenge.
    No
    0.01
    0.99
    0.01
  4. Posterior odds calculationPrior odds = P(H₁)/P(H₀) ≈ 0.005 / 0.995 ≈ 0.005Likelihood ratio (total BF) ≈ 9 × 0.105 × 0.051 × 0.202 × 2.67 × 0.01 ≈ 2.6 × 10⁻⁵ (overwhelming evidence against H₁). Posterior odds ≈ 0.005 × 2.6 × 10⁻⁵ ≈ 1.3 × 10⁻⁷P(H₁ | evidence) ≈ 1.3 × 10⁻⁷ ≈ 0 (negligible).
How to Replicate:
  • Bayes formula: P(H₁|E) = [P(E|H₁) P(H₁)] / P(E).
  • Adjust priors/BFs subjectively (e.g., higher prior → still <0.001).
  • VerdictNo credible link—a false positive from superficial parallels, refuted by timelines and experts.

Tenuous "links" exist (e.g., shared Cretan sympathy, scholarly debate), but none causal. Probability of any non-trivial connection: ~0.00001.


 

....and as a contrast 


In terms of probability theory, what are the chances that there is a link between Captain Nemo and Raphael Semmes?


Thought for 34s

**There is an extraordinarily strong link between Captain Nemo (from Jules Verne's Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, serialized 1869–1870) and Raphael Semmes (Confederate captain of the CSS Alabama, 1862–1864), supported by over 100 documented textual, thematic, and historical parallels.civilwartalk.com+3 more

Probability Assessment in Probability Theory Terms

Using Bayesian inference to quantify the "chances":

  • Prior probability : ~0.01–0.05. Verne was obsessed with the American Civil War, submarines, and raiders; Semmes' exploits were world-famous (sank 65+ Union ships). Verne explicitly compared the Alabama to the Nautilus in a 1869 letter to his publisher.en.wikipedia.org
  • Likelihood : All parallels align perfectly.
  • Likelihood : For independent coincidences, assume each match has  (generous). With ≥50 specific matches (e.g., exact phrases, rare events), this is  – smaller than the number of atoms in the observable universe (~1080).

Posterior odds.

Thus,  – virtually certain (for practical purposes, >99.999...%). No serious debunkings exist; skeptics accept influence but question direct meetings (unneeded for inspiration).civilwartalk.com

This isn't vague "inspiration" – it's a direct literary fingerprint.

Key Parallels (Sample of 25+; Full List >100)

Category
Semmes / CSS Alabama
Nemo / Nautilus
Reference
Construction
Built in Birkenhead, England
Built in Birkenhead, England
en.wikipedia.org
Motto/Origin
From Mobile, Alabama
"Mobilis in Mobile"
en.wikipedia.org
Pirate Label
Branded pirate by Abraham Lincoln; bounty
Branded pirate; bounty by Captain Farragut
en.wikipedia.org
Pursuit
Chased by Admiral Farragut
Chased by USS Abraham Lincoln
en.wikipedia.org
Final Battle
Sunk off Cherbourg, France
Attacks off Cherbourg
en.wikipedia.org
Cigars
Collects seed pod mistaken for Havana cigar
Gives seaweed cigar mistaken for Havana
civilwartalk.com
Whales
Describes sleeping sperm whalesright whales in warm waters
Identical descriptions
civilwartalk.com
Maury Tribute
Honors oceanographer Matthew Fontaine Maury; notes his post-war fall
Identical tribute & comment
civilwartalk.com
Florida Ship
Details sinking of CSS Florida
Encounters wreck of Florida
civilwartalk.com
Portraits
Jefferson Davis in cabin
Abraham Lincoln in cabin
en.wikipedia.org
HQ/Funding
Bankrolled from Nautilus House, Liverpool
N/A (direct name match)
en.wikipedia.org
Other Matches
Swordfish pierces hull; albatross; argonaut swarms; Malay food; Gulf Stream; wife/ship analogy; family loss lament; coral mausoleums; white water; extinct volcano
Identical
civilwartalk.com

Timing: Semmes' Memoirs (1869) published months before/during Verne's serialization. Semmes visited Paris post-sinking.civilwartalk.com

How to Verify Yourself (Transparent Reasoning)
  1. Read Semmes' Memoirs (free on Archive.org) vs. Verne.
  2. Compute coincidence probability: Even 10 matches at 1% each = .
  3. Scholars (Butcher 1998, Lamb 2025) confirm via exact quotes.en.wikipedia.org

Bottom line: The link is as real as gravity – probability ≈ 100%. Nemo = Semmes + submarine + anti-British twist. 🐋⚓


Again, please look at the 100 links explained table which I attach again below (the one Grok does not know about), with all the links fully explained.


Thanks for the time in taking to reply, it is greatly appreciated. I will get nowhere if people do not robustly challenge me and that is what you are spending time and effort doing.


Please get back to me regarding the combined relevance of firstly the 100 explained linked points between Semmes and Nemo in the table (attached), secondly the context of the three Grok search results in this thread and thirdly 'Semmes sunk Arna'.

It is the sum of any evidence from a variety of sources that is crucil in supporting a hypothesis. I hope you will agree on this.

best John

As always here is my 100 point attachment to support the Semmes hypothesis, much of it not known as yet by Grok or anyone else. 

Best John

Semmes Nemo - 100 facts used in Verne's Text and explanatory notes.pdf

Don Sample

unread,
Oct 31, 2025, 6:15:37 PMOct 31
to jules-ve...@googlegroups.com
I’ve looked over your 100 points. Many of them are just things you’d see in any story about a 19th century ocean voyage, others you really have to squint at sideways to make them look similar, and many of them are just plain wrong.  

Point 5: both had ships lost in storms, but your supporting “evidence” for the Nautilus is a description of it sailing through a storm unscathed.

You say that both are voyages of 70,000 miles, but 20,000 leagues is only 50,000 miles.

You say the Nautilus has a multinational crew, but it doesn’t.

You say they both have collections of timepieces in their cabins, but Semmes had a collection of chronometers he’d stolen from ships he’d looted, while Nemo had the navigational instruments he needed to navigate, which included chronometers — something you’d expect to find in any sea captain’s cabin.

I could go on but I’m doing this mostly from memory.

On Oct 31, 2025, at 12:57 PM, John Lamb <cads...@gmail.com> wrote:


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jules Verne Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jules-verne-fo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jules-verne-forum/756d5a51-132d-4fc5-aab7-cf792c24ab3cn%40googlegroups.com.
<Semmes Nemo - 100 facts used in Verne's Text and explanatory notes.pdf>

John Lamb

unread,
Oct 31, 2025, 9:49:06 PMOct 31
to Jules Verne Forum

Dear Don, 

 

There is a certain amusing irony in all this as we can have have a long drawn-out discussion re the 100 factual links (and they are factual) between Semmes and Nemo, something that we could never do with Nemo and Flourens (hence the 0.00001%.)…but I hear no criticism from you of the one link that Butcher gave with Flourens –  a major dragon that has to be slaid before we move on, oops I forgot -irrespective of me that  has already been slayed, by Grok on A.I. unless you want to resurrect it?   

  Anyway, you say

 

I’ve looked over your 100 points. Many of them are just things you’d see in any story about a 19th century ocean voyage, others you really have to squint at sideways to make them look similar, and many of them are just plain wrong.  

 

Now these are my 100 skittles, all set up by myself  in the wide Jules Verne bowling alley, some will stand out, perhaps placed there purposely by me for amusement (strong but looking vulnerable) for the opposition to waste one of their few bowling balls on an lonely skittle that screams ‘knock me down’.

So as for the four skittles you have aimed at me out of the one hundred set up…

Skittle one. You say.

 

 both had ships lost in storms, but your supporting “evidence” for the Nautilus is a description of it sailing through a storm unscathed.

 

Semmes lost his ship Sumter in a great storm (fact), the Nautilus sails through a great storm and into the Maelstrom, Verne says it is 'lost' (in other words we don’t know where it is until we read Mysterious Island) in  20,000 Leagues but is later  ‘found’ in The Mysterious Island…

 

Verdict on skittle one ….The skittle still stands….Hooray!

 

 

Skittle Two. You say.

 

both are voyages of 70,000 miles, but 20,000 leagues is only 50,000 miles.

 

...so in your reckoning one league is two and half miles whereas a nautical league is actually according to Wikipedia is 3.45 miles…

 

Oh dear Don,  .. you need to get your seaboots on!

 

20,000 leagues x 3.45 is 69,000 miles 


…sorry for being 1.3% out ….but as I said both are voyages of 70,000 miles, but 20,000 leagues. In fact forget the 1.3% ...in a homage to my brother pointing this out...I am spot on. 

 

Verdict on skittle two.. The skittle still stands. Hooray!



Skittle Three. You say. 

 

You say the Nautilus has a multinational crew, but it doesn’t.

 

So, Captain Nemo is Indian, the crew member fighting against the giant squid talks in French and they all speak a foreign language (similar to Verne’s supported Esperanto) that Aronnax does not understand. Plus Nemo’s adjutant in the first sketch of Nemo looks decidedly mixed race. Looks pretty multinational to me. 

 

Verdict on skittle three.. The skittle still stands. Hooray!

 

 Skittle Four. You say.

 

You say they both have collections of timepieces in their cabins, but Semmes had a collection of chronometers he’d stolen from ships he’d looted, while Nemo had the navigational instruments he needed to navigate, which included chronometers — something you’d expect to find in any sea captain’s cabin.

 

I could go on but I’m doing this mostly from memory.

 

Thank you, Don as this means you have taken time to read my detailed analysis. Agreed with above but Verne emphasizes chronometers and the mass agglomeration of instruments in the Captain’s cabin as illustrated in 20,000 Leagues mirrors exactly the reality in n Semmes’s cabin. Whether you call them chronometers or not, in Verne’s illustration of Nemo’s cabin there are 13 instruments next to Nemo’s bed, this is way beyond ‘something you’d expect to find in any sea captain’s cabin, but well short of the 56 chronometers that Semmes had mounted on his cabin wall next to his bed. Important to not take it to literally and see it in context of everything else.

 

Does not the fact we are arguing about such minutiae suggest something to you or should we put the same minutae scrutiny towards Flourens and talk about the minutiae of Crete?

 

Verdict on skittle four.. The skittle still stands. Hooray!

 

I will post on your other points shortly, but all my skittles still stand, because as I say you are arguing against the words of the great Jules Verne himself with me just looking on.

Best John

John Lamb

unread,
Oct 31, 2025, 10:04:24 PMOct 31
to Jules Verne Forum

Dear Don, 

re your statement 

I’ve looked over your 100 points. Many of them are just things you’d see in any story about a 19th century ocean voyage, others you really have to squint at sideways to make them look similar, and many of them are just plain wrong.  

I could go on but I’m doing this mostly from memory.

Please 'go on' regarding your statement that  'many of them (my Semmes Nemo link points) are just plain wrong' ..if you state that many aspects of my research are 'plain wrong'  without going in to detail then this is both grossly unfair and unscientific. You gave me four and I sank them without trace...so please give me some more. 

Best John

Don Sample

unread,
Oct 31, 2025, 10:47:25 PMOct 31
to jules-ve...@googlegroups.com


On Oct 31, 2025, at 9:49 PM, John Lamb <cads...@gmail.com> wrote:



Dear Don, 

 

There is a certain amusing irony in all this as we can have have a long drawn-out discussion re the 100 factual links (and they are factual) between Semmes and Nemo, something that we could never do with Nemo and Flourens (hence the 0.00001%.)…but I hear no criticism from you of the one link that Butcher gave with Flourens –  a major dragon that has to be slaid before we move on, oops I forgot -irrespective of me that  has already been slayed, by Grok on A.I. unless you want to resurrect it?   

  Anyway, you say

 

I’ve looked over your 100 points. Many of them are just things you’d see in any story about a 19th century ocean voyage, others you really have to squint at sideways to make them look similar, and many of them are just plain wrong.  

 

Now these are my 100 skittles, all set up by myself  in the wide Jules Verne bowling alley, some will stand out, perhaps placed there purposely by me for amusement (strong but looking vulnerable) for the opposition to waste one of their few bowling balls on an lonely skittle that screams ‘knock me down’.

So as for the four skittles you have aimed at me out of the one hundred set up…

Skittle one. You say.

 

 both had ships lost in storms, but your supporting “evidence” for the Nautilus is a description of it sailing through a storm unscathed.

 

Semmes lost his ship Sumter in a great storm (fact), the Nautilus sails through a great storm and into the Maelstrom, Verne says it is 'lost' (in other words we don’t know where it is until we read Mysterious Island) in  20,000 Leagues but is later  ‘found’ in The Mysterious Island…

 

Verdict on skittle one ….The skittle still stands….Hooray!


The Nautilus passes through the hurricane off Long Island on May 15, and enters the Maelstrom at Lofoten on June 20, over a month later.

 

 

Skittle Two. You say.

 

both are voyages of 70,000 miles, but 20,000 leagues is only 50,000 miles.

 

...so in your reckoning one league is two and half miles whereas a nautical league is actually according to Wikipedia is 3.45 miles…

 

Oh dear Don,  .. you need to get your seaboots on!

 

20,000 leagues x 3.45 is 69,000 miles 

…sorry for being 1.3% out ….but as I said both are voyages of 70,000 miles, but 20,000 leagues. In fact forget the 1.3% ...in a homage to my brother pointing this out...I am spot on. 

 

Verdict on skittle two.. The skittle still stands. Hooray


Verne’s use of “lieue” is commonly translated into English as “league,” but the French lieue is 4 kilometres. This is confirmed in several places in the book where Verne gives distances using both lieues, and nautical miles.


Skittle Three. You say. 

 

You say the Nautilus has a multinational crew, but it doesn’t.

 

So, Captain Nemo is Indian, the crew member fighting against the giant squid talks in French and they all speak a foreign language (similar to Verne’s supported Esperanto) that Aronnax does not understand. Plus Nemo’s adjutant in the first sketch of Nemo looks decidedly mixed race. Looks pretty multinational to me. 

 

Verdict on skittle three.. The skittle still stands. Hooray!


Nemo and his crew were Indian. That one of them called out in French for aid from a group of Francophones only says that he knew who was close by, and how best to talk to them.

 

 Skittle Four. You say.

 

You say they both have collections of timepieces in their cabins, but Semmes had a collection of chronometers he’d stolen from ships he’d looted, while Nemo had the navigational instruments he needed to navigate, which included chronometers — something you’d expect to find in any sea captain’s cabin.

 

I could go on but I’m doing this mostly from memory.

 

Thank you, Don as this means you have taken time to read my detailed analysis. Agreed with above but Verne emphasizes chronometers and the mass agglomeration of instruments in the Captain’s cabin as illustrated in 20,000 Leagues mirrors exactly the reality in n Semmes’s cabin. Whether you call them chronometers or not, in Verne’s illustration of Nemo’s cabin there are 13 instruments next to Nemo’s bed, this is way beyond ‘something you’d expect to find in any sea captain’s cabin, but well short of the 56 chronometers that Semmes had mounted on his cabin wall next to his bed. Important to not take it to literally and see it in context of everything else.

 

Does not the fact we are arguing about such minutiae suggest something to you or should we put the same minutae scrutiny towards Flourens and talk about the minutiae of Crete?

 

Verdict on skittle four.. The skittle still stands. Hooray!


Verne didn’t illustrate his books. Riou did, and while Verne may have had some input over what went into those illustrations, final say went to the publisher, who likely as not was more interested in meeting his printing schedules than fixing minor disagreements between his writer, and illustrator.

John Lamb

unread,
Nov 1, 2025, 12:01:26 AMNov 1
to Jules Verne Forum

Dear Don, 
 

My saying 'Verne’s illustration of Nemo’s cabin' was  figure of speech as you probably well know.... ... 'final say went to publisher', yes but Verne undoubtedly gave a description of what he wanted in the illustration and the glut of chronometer like instruments fits Semmes's historical fact. I take it you have capitulated on the other three skittles, but please line more up. 


Best John 

John Lamb

unread,
Nov 1, 2025, 12:24:40 AMNov 1
to Jules Verne Forum
Dear Don, I apologize, I did not see your answers inbetween the text. Re Leagues it is up for interpretation but I accept your French 50,000 miles  as 80,000 km however I will still hold on the anglophile translation re Leagues as this all about the anglophile interpretation of the novel in the context of Semmes i.e. 20,000 Leagues for an American sea captain is 70.000 miles. Re the storm and Maelstrom I also accept this as fact that the Nautilus went down the Maelstrom after the storm,   , however  I hope you will accept as fact that the Alabama disappeared down a whirlpool on June 19th 1864. as did the Nautilus around this month and date(where did you get 20th June from I had to extrapolate this data from Verne's script). I unreservedly withdraw the storm claim and apologise. I will split the Semmes captain philosopher link into two to maintain my 100. Re the multinational nature of the crew of the Nautilus I still hang true as they speak a universal foreign tongue, revert to French when stressed and have an Indian Captain. 

Best John

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages