To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/D3D8C322.5AE4A%25ingunawa%40cisco.com.
Thanks, I will try that.
I guess this gets to the heart of my question...
If I make it so that an old job won't run on builder, will it fail over to the newly created node?
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/e70472f5-6012-4d5b-9eab-a3790d9c5ef3%40googlegroups.com.
Does the use of node label contain a notion of “affinity”. In other words, I would like a build to go to node A always, unless node A is unavailable.
I implemented my own failover by using a node label parameter with a default node of A and a “possible nodes” of the failover node.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtEHQWdaN2up2ka6WLVyGHaMFPuV8TJj5jVMCMfY1unpsw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/6C6EE445A6F6CE4E8A0FFB51B071A4E2D873FF1F%40AMERMBX02.PERKINELMER.NET.
Thank you Mark
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtFDJr7Vy__NnacUmjGfMpSPPDKvp82n8jgJhfrd%2B6bkmw%40mail.gmail.com.