structs v1.7 is missing. To fix, install v1.7 or later.

[DEEPAK VERMA]

i am getting this error. 

structs v1.7 is missing. To fix, install v1.7 or later.

Although I placed the struts and performance plugin at designated folder but still getting this error.

P.S. What ever suggestion come, please write all commands and step wise process to resolve this as I am very new in Jenkins.

[Baptiste Mathus]

Did you check the structs.jpi is not corrupted?

Cf. https://updates.jenkins.io/download/plugins/structs/ where you'll see the expected SHA1.

What is the sha1 of your structs.jpi file? Can you open it as a zip file?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/6d98d6fa-6106-497a-a888-432f9b7d8d94%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Mark Waite]

When I downloaded structs-1.7.hpi from the Jenkins artifact repository, it was 50 KB, not 38 KB.

Are you using the Plugin Manager to download the plugins, or trying to do the work of downloading the plugins yourself?

The Jenkins user interface is the best choice to download plugins, since it will download the requested plugin and all its dependencies.

Mark Waite

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CANWgJS4r24HNy31azoKTYmheqVVnBnY%2BUeJdLaE8%2BGF-cd46Pw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Steve Burrus]

Mark Waite do yoiu NOT ch oose to help me any further with my continuing problem with always get the login page after I have successfully activated Jenkins? Just go ahead and tell me that you don't WANT TO help me any more and I will seek other sources of help/assistance. Please respond to me soon as I really want to finally resolve this.      

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtH5r3CtdVv9695w4AcAQDxJJwcfe-CuGpoXvdQhUkxqkw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Baptiste Mathus]

Please read my previous answer and stay in your thread. 

As you can see https://groups.google.com/forum/m/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/jenkinsci-users/el7xKPpntU0/7Zo-QuEoBgAJ you didn't even answer Mark and here you're doing what is called a 'thread hijacking'.

And again, please do not use all caps. This is offensive. 

Mark *has* helped you, and even if I'm sure he wouldn't do that, would he ever decide to stop helping you or anyone else, that would*not* entitle you or anyone else to demand explanations this way.

Thank you

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CABinwmVEcfT0xd_CG8Gh%2BiecAwrD5%2B02jKD8kCcfTHERFpoftQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Mark Waite]

Steve,

Please don't hijack the questions of others.  I think it is unfair to do that to the original requester and to those responding to that question.

I'm sorry that your problem is not yet resolved.  My previous attempts to resolve your issue with brief answers have failed.  The problem is still there for you.  I can't duplicate your problem.  It seemed to me when I read the e-mail you sent to me directly yesterday that you needed a much more detailed response that will show step by step my guesses of how to resolve the problem you're seeing.

I arrived home last night after midnight after a week of business travel.  I've been working 12 hour days for a month or more preparing for last week's conference.  I was traveling when I saw your request for help in my personal e-mail less than 24 hours ago.  I was exhausted when I arrived home after midnight and didn't give you an answer.  Unfortunately, after a week of travel, I'm hesitant to give you a significant amount of my family time.

While you are welcome to send me e-mail directly as you did, I think it is unreasonable to expect a response on a weekend and less than 24 hours after you sent the initial request.  I have already offered all the short answers that I thought would resolve your issue.  They didn't resolve it.  I believed last night that the next answer will need to be much longer and much more detailed since the short answers have not solved the problem.

If you are demanding a yes/no answer, then my answer is "no", I won't help you.  Your expectations of help seem to be that I'll provide detailed answers rapidly.  I can't commit to do that.

If you're willing to receive answers on my timeline, then 3-4 days from now I may be able to provide the detailed answer that I think will be required.

Mark Waite

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CABinwmVEcfT0xd_CG8Gh%2BiecAwrD5%2B02jKD8kCcfTHERFpoftQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Steve Burrus]

YES UYES Mark I am MOST WILLING to wait at least 3 - 4 days for your help an d I am very sorry that I seemed to be "pushy" or in any way impatient for a response from you. 

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtEBgRU2XF92f-MXtQ6rOuXyHMM90P%3DmPCOhENP0MhcYTA%40mail.gmail.com.

[R. Tyler Croy]

(replies inline)

On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, Steve Burrus wrote:

> YES UYES Mark I am MOST WILLING to wait at least 3 - 4 days for your help
> an d I am very sorry that I seemed to be "pushy" or in any way impatient
> for a response from you.

Jumping in as mailing list moderator.

Many of the folks around here are volunteers and are under no obligation to
provide help, and any assistance people are willing to share I very much
appreciate.


I will not hestitate to bans users for antagonistic behavior, so please be
friendly and respectful of each others' time.


Cheers
-R Tyler Croy