[JIRA] (JENKINS-61953) Build Blocker plugin - Validate regex does not work

[len_isac@hotmail.com (JIRA)]

Len Isac created an issue

Jenkins / JENKINS-61953 Build Blocker plugin - Validate regex does not work Issue Type: Bug Assignee: Unassigned Components: build-blocker-plugin Created: 2020-04-17 19:57 Priority: Minor Reporter: Len Isac I have my regexes defined under 'Blocking Jobs'.  When I try clicking on 'Validate regex' I see a quick pop saying "Checking" then it immediately disappears.   The block doesn't appear to be working for me though.   I'm using just: .<job_name_to_block>.   Does it search for all jobs defined under $JENKINS_HOME/jobs?  Or is it relative to the current job's directory?  In any case, the above does not seem to work for me. Add Comment

This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.12#713012-sha1:6e07c38)

[len_isac@hotmail.com (JIRA)]

Len Isac updated an issue

Jenkins / JENKINS-61953 Build Blocker plugin - Validate regex does not work

Change By: Len Isac Attachment: image-2020-04-17-15-59-06-607.png Attachment: image-2020-04-17-15-58-59-876.png

I have my regexes defined under 'Blocking Jobs'.  When I try clicking on 'Validate regex' I see a quick pop saying "Checking" then it immediately disappears.

The block doesn't appear to be working for me though !image-2020-04-17-15-59-06-607 . png!   I'm using just: .*<job_name_to_block>.*   Does it this search for all jobs defined under $JENKINS_HOME/jobs?  Or is it relative to the current job's directory?  In any case, the above does not seem to work for me.

Add Comment

[len_isac@hotmail.com (JIRA)]

Len Isac updated an issue

Jenkins / JENKINS-61953 Build Blocker plugin - Validate regex does not work Change By: Len Isac

I have my regexes defined under 'Blocking Jobs'.  When I try clicking on 'Validate regex' I see a quick pop saying "Checking" then it immediately disappears.

!image-2020-04-17-15-59-06-607.png!   Does this search for all jobs defined under $JENKINS_HOME/jobs?   Or is it relative to the current job's directory?  In any case, the above does not seem to work for me.

Add Comment