[JIRA] (JENKINS-54304) Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

21 views
Skip to first unread message

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 29, 2018, 4:40:02 AM10/29/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini created an issue
 
Jenkins / Bug JENKINS-54304
Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.
Issue Type: Bug Bug
Assignee: Oleg Nenashev
Attachments: Selection_047.png, Selection_048.png
Components: _unsorted
Created: 2018-10-29 08:39
Environment: Jenkins 2.138.2
Priority: Major Major
Reporter: fisnik hajredini

This issue manifested itself since October 15th.

When a build is triggered and it runs on multiple slaves parallely, you normally get an output for each line corresponding to the variant its running. Since a Jenkins update on October 15th, this has not been the case. This is making it harder for us to debug the issues on the variants/slaves, as we don't know on which variant the issue is being manifested.

NOTE:

Although unrelated, this issue was manifested together with another bug which doesn't allow an anonymous user to view jobs, even if logged in as a non-admin. Only users with admin privileges are allowed to view the logs. That issue has been found on your backlog.

 

Add Comment Add Comment
 
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 29, 2018, 11:06:03 AM10/29/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
This issue manifested itself since October 15th.

When a build is triggered and it runs on multiple slaves parallely, you normally get an output for each line corresponding to the variant its running. Since a Jenkins update on October 15th, this has not been the case. This is making it harder for us to debug the issues on the variants/slaves, as we don't know on which variant the issue is being manifested.

_NOTE:_


Although unrelated, this issue was manifested together with another bug which doesn't allow an anonymous user to view jobs, even if logged in as a non-admin. Only users with admin privileges are allowed to view the logs. That issue has been found on your backlog.

o.v.nenashev@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 1:52:01 AM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Oleg Nenashev updated an issue
Change By: Oleg Nenashev
Component/s: pipeline
Component/s: _unsorted

o.v.nenashev@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 1:52:02 AM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Oleg Nenashev assigned an issue to Jesse Glick
Change By: Oleg Nenashev
Assignee: Oleg Nenashev Jesse Glick

o.v.nenashev@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 1:53:02 AM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Oleg Nenashev commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

Jesse Glick Sam Van Oort I believe it is just another issue caused by the recent Pipeline plugins. PTAL

fisnik hajredini please provide the list of plugin versions you have installed on your instance

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 4:59:01 AM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

The following was generated using this groovy script:

Jenkins.instance.pluginManager.plugins.each{
  plugin -> 
    println ("${plugin.getDisplayName()} (${plugin.getShortName()}): ${plugin.getVersion()}")
}

Durable Task Plugin (durable-task): 1.26
Pipeline: Nodes and Processes (workflow-durable-task-step): 2.25
Nexus Artifact Uploader (nexus-artifact-uploader): 2.10
GitHub Branch Source Plugin (github-branch-source): 2.4.1
Pipeline: SCM Step (workflow-scm-step): 2.7
Pipeline (workflow-aggregator): 2.6
Pipeline: API (workflow-api): 2.31
Pipeline: Declarative (pipeline-model-definition): 1.3.2
Pipeline: GitHub Groovy Libraries (pipeline-github-lib): 1.0
Ant Plugin (ant): 1.8
Apache HttpComponents Client 4.x API Plugin (apache-httpcomponents-client-4-api): 4.5.5-3.0
Workspace Cleanup Plugin (ws-cleanup): 0.36
Command Agent Launcher Plugin (command-launcher): 1.2
SSH Slaves plugin (ssh-slaves): 1.28.1
Windows Slaves Plugin (windows-slaves): 1.3.1
JavaScript GUI Lib: Moment.js bundle plugin (momentjs): 1.1.1
Pipeline: Basic Steps (workflow-basic-steps): 2.12
Lockable Resources plugin (lockable-resources): 2.3
JDK Tool Plugin (jdk-tool): 1.1
Pipeline: REST API Plugin (pipeline-rest-api): 2.10
Pipeline: Shared Groovy Libraries (workflow-cps-global-lib): 2.12
Folders Plugin (cloudbees-folder): 6.6
JSch dependency plugin (jsch): 0.1.54.2
Build Timeout (build-timeout): 1.19
Job Configuration History Plugin (jobConfigHistory): 2.18.3
Credentials Binding Plugin (credentials-binding): 1.16
PAM Authentication plugin (pam-auth): 1.4
Token Macro Plugin (token-macro): 2.5
Matrix Authorization Strategy Plugin (matrix-auth): 2.3
Docker Commons Plugin (docker-commons): 1.13
Pipeline: Milestone Step (pipeline-milestone-step): 1.3.1
LDAP Plugin (ldap): 1.20
Green Balls (greenballs): 1.15
External Monitor Job Type Plugin (external-monitor-job): 1.7
Copy Artifact Plugin (copyartifact): 1.41
Resource Disposer Plugin (resource-disposer): 0.12
Pipeline: Build Step (pipeline-build-step): 2.7
JavaScript GUI Lib: Handlebars bundle plugin (handlebars): 1.1.1
Pipeline: Supporting APIs (workflow-support): 2.21
Gradle Plugin (gradle): 1.29
Pipeline: Job (workflow-job): 2.26
Structs Plugin (structs): 1.17
Pipeline: Groovy (workflow-cps): 2.60
Matrix Project Plugin (matrix-project): 1.13
Simple Theme Plugin (simple-theme-plugin): 0.5.1
GitHub Authentication plugin (github-oauth): 0.29
Branch API Plugin (branch-api): 2.0.20
GitHub API Plugin (github-api): 1.92
Pipeline: Stage View Plugin (pipeline-stage-view): 2.10
OWASP Markup Formatter Plugin (antisamy-markup-formatter): 1.5
Pipeline: Stage Tags Metadata (pipeline-stage-tags-metadata): 1.3.2
bouncycastle API Plugin (bouncycastle-api): 2.17
Jackson 2 API Plugin (jackson2-api): 2.8.11.3
Email Extension Plugin (email-ext): 2.63
JavaScript GUI Lib: ACE Editor bundle plugin (ace-editor): 1.1
Docker Pipeline (docker-workflow): 1.17
GitHub plugin (github): 1.29.3
Pipeline: Multibranch (workflow-multibranch): 2.20
JUnit Plugin (junit): 1.26.1
SSH Credentials Plugin (ssh-credentials): 1.14
Node and Label parameter plugin (nodelabelparameter): 1.7.2
Credentials Plugin (credentials): 2.1.18
Nexus Platform Plugin (nexus-jenkins-plugin): 3.3.20181025-134249.614c5f4
Authentication Tokens API Plugin (authentication-tokens): 1.3
Script Security Plugin (script-security): 1.48
JavaScript GUI Lib: jQuery bundles (jQuery and jQuery UI) plugin (jquery-detached): 1.2.1
Pipeline: Input Step (pipeline-input-step): 2.8
jQuery plugin (jquery): 1.12.4-0
Pipeline: Model API (pipeline-model-api): 1.3.2
Pipeline: Declarative Extension Points API (pipeline-model-extensions): 1.3.2
MapDB API Plugin (mapdb-api): 1.0.9.0
Display URL API (display-url-api): 2.2.0
Pipeline Graph Analysis Plugin (pipeline-graph-analysis): 1.7
Plain Credentials Plugin (plain-credentials): 1.4
Git client plugin (git-client): 2.7.3
Pipeline: Stage Step (pipeline-stage-step): 2.3
GIT server Plugin (git-server): 1.7
Build With Parameters (build-with-parameters): 1.4
Mailer Plugin (mailer): 1.22
Timestamper (timestamper): 1.8.10
Git plugin (git): 3.9.1
Pipeline Utility Steps (pipeline-utility-steps): 2.1.0
SCM API Plugin (scm-api): 2.3.0
Subversion Plug-in (subversion): 2.12.1
Pipeline: Declarative Agent API (pipeline-model-declarative-agent): 1.1.1
Pipeline: Step API (workflow-step-api): 2.16
Result: [Plugin:durable-task, Plugin:workflow-durable-task-step, Plugin:nexus-artifact-uploader, Plugin:github-branch-source, Plugin:workflow-scm-step, Plugin:workflow-aggregator, Plugin:workflow-api, Plugin:pipeline-model-definition, Plugin:pipeline-github-lib, Plugin:ant, Plugin:apache-httpcomponents-client-4-api, Plugin:ws-cleanup, Plugin:command-launcher, Plugin:ssh-slaves, Plugin:windows-slaves, Plugin:momentjs, Plugin:workflow-basic-steps, Plugin:lockable-resources, Plugin:jdk-tool, Plugin:pipeline-rest-api, Plugin:workflow-cps-global-lib, Plugin:cloudbees-folder, Plugin:jsch, Plugin:build-timeout, Plugin:jobConfigHistory, Plugin:credentials-binding, Plugin:pam-auth, Plugin:token-macro, Plugin:matrix-auth, Plugin:docker-commons, Plugin:pipeline-milestone-step, Plugin:ldap, Plugin:greenballs, Plugin:external-monitor-job, Plugin:copyartifact, Plugin:resource-disposer, Plugin:pipeline-build-step, Plugin:handlebars, Plugin:workflow-support, Plugin:gradle, Plugin:workflow-job, Plugin:structs, Plugin:workflow-cps, Plugin:matrix-project, Plugin:simple-theme-plugin, Plugin:github-oauth, Plugin:branch-api, Plugin:github-api, Plugin:pipeline-stage-view, Plugin:antisamy-markup-formatter, Plugin:pipeline-stage-tags-metadata, Plugin:bouncycastle-api, Plugin:jackson2-api, Plugin:email-ext, Plugin:ace-editor, Plugin:docker-workflow, Plugin:github, Plugin:workflow-multibranch, Plugin:junit, Plugin:ssh-credentials, Plugin:nodelabelparameter, Plugin:credentials, Plugin:nexus-jenkins-plugin, Plugin:authentication-tokens, Plugin:script-security, Plugin:jquery-detached, Plugin:pipeline-input-step, Plugin:jquery, Plugin:pipeline-model-api, Plugin:pipeline-model-extensions, Plugin:mapdb-api, Plugin:display-url-api, Plugin:pipeline-graph-analysis, Plugin:plain-credentials, Plugin:git-client, Plugin:pipeline-stage-step, Plugin:git-server, Plugin:build-with-parameters, Plugin:mailer, Plugin:timestamper, Plugin:git, Plugin:pipeline-utility-steps, Plugin:scm-api, Plugin:subversion, Plugin:pipeline-model-declarative-agent, Plugin:workflow-step-api]

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 8:47:02 AM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick updated an issue
 
Change By: Jesse Glick
Component/s: workflow-job-plugin
Component/s: pipeline

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 8:49:02 AM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

This is as designed. The HTML rendering layer was rewritten. You can click on (hide) links to suppress irrelevant branches or other blocks. There is a TODO comment requesting that in the case of parallel, all but the first branch be hidden by default. Or, a similar kind of branch prefix could be displayed in JS/CSS without requiring the physical log to have that prefix, as it did before.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 3:31:02 PM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick started work on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Change By: Jesse Glick
Status: Open In Progress

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 30, 2018, 3:38:02 PM10/30/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 31, 2018, 6:03:02 AM10/31/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

Sorry Jesse, i couldn't understand. Were you referring to the colleagues, or are you saying that this is not an issue and its working as intended? If the latter, what steps can i take to make it as it used to be?

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 31, 2018, 6:03:02 AM10/31/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Comment:
Sorry Jesse, i couldn't understand. Were you referring to the colleagues, or are you saying that this is not an issue and its working as intended? If the latter, what steps can i take to make it as it used to be?

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Oct 31, 2018, 12:45:02 PM10/31/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

An experimental build if you care to try it out. (And if you are handy with CSS, please, offer improvements.)

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 5, 2018, 5:13:04 AM11/5/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

That did not fix the issue we are having. Everything seems to be running the same way.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 5, 2018, 6:06:02 PM11/5/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Working for me… make sure you are actually running the stated build (check Plugin Manager » Installed) and attach a screenshot.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 6, 2018, 8:36:02 AM11/6/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: image-2018-11-06-14-35-41-221.png

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 6, 2018, 8:40:03 AM11/6/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

Here you go: 

I cant find the specific version ID, but here is another one which asks me to downgrade it to the previous one:

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 6, 2018, 8:40:03 AM11/6/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: image-2018-11-06-14-39-16-393.png

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 7, 2018, 4:21:02 AM11/7/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

Just so that I make sure i am trying it on the correct way: Is there any way i can enable/disable this feature? Maybe with the new update it got disabled by default. I didnt understand the message where u said "This is as designed..........". This was working for us for over a year now, and now it just stopped.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 7, 2018, 8:55:02 AM11/7/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Looks like you were running an experimental build, then upgraded to an official release marked newer than it. Try installing this newer build.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 8, 2018, 9:39:02 AM11/8/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: image-2018-11-08-15-38-49-986.png

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 8, 2018, 9:40:02 AM11/8/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: image-2018-11-08-15-39-26-889.png

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 8, 2018, 9:42:01 AM11/8/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: image-2018-11-08-15-41-10-158.png

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 8, 2018, 9:42:02 AM11/8/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

So initially there was an update to 2.28 which i tried and it didnt have this issue fixed. Afterwards i tried the newer build you offered and it also didnt work

Pictures:

The variant should've been in front each line.

 

Version:

 

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 8, 2018, 2:54:02 PM11/8/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Please attach the log and log-index files from the build directory ($JENKINS_HOME/jobs/*/builds/*/) and show a full-size screenshot including a point at which output switches from one branch to another, and note any browser console warnings or errors.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 12, 2018, 5:14:02 AM11/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 12, 2018, 5:14:02 AM11/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 12, 2018, 5:14:03 AM11/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 12, 2018, 5:20:02 AM11/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 12, 2018, 5:20:02 AM11/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

I have added a picture called two-variants (I assume that by output of switches from one branch to the other you meant by two different variants). The colors represent different variants which before used to have a notation in front of them in this form:

[Variant Name]: NOTE: Running task ..... 

The only warning from the browser is:

‘src’ attribute of <script> element is empty.

 I've also attached log-index and log as requested.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 12, 2018, 5:20:02 AM11/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 13, 2018, 9:18:02 AM11/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

fisnik hajredini I suspect the browser error is the clue—for some reason the script which displays branch annotations is not loaded. It is hard to be sure from your screenshot since it is only from a region of the screen, not the whole browser window. See if your console page contains something like <script src='/descriptor/org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.console.NewNodeConsoleNote/script.js' /> and whether the loaded script file contains a line 37

var branch = label.substring(8)

Also you may need to force a page reload.

Judging by the frequency of branch transitions, you likely want to run with the startup option -Dorg.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.durable_task.DurableTaskStep.USE_WATCHING=true to get better performance. This mode is currently disabled pending some unreleased fixes related to coloration and some field reports of failures, but it is intended to be the default mode going forward.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 13, 2018, 11:02:03 AM11/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 13, 2018, 11:02:03 AM11/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: NewNodeConsoleNote-script.js

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 13, 2018, 11:02:03 AM11/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

I am attaching my browsers source code when im viewing the console. I named it jenkins-browser-log

Besides the browser source code I checked the script. The script actually exists but the line 37 is not included. I have also attached the given script.

Just FYI, we have tested this in chromium and in firefox, the issue manifests on both of them.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 13, 2018, 11:08:02 AM11/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
I am attaching my browsers source code when im viewing the console. I named it jenkins-browser-log

Besides the browser source code I checked the script. The script actually exists but the line 37 is not included. I have also attached the given script. Its called `NewNodeConsoleNote-script.js`

Just FYI, we have tested this in chromium and in firefox, the issue manifests on both of them.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 13, 2018, 11:21:02 AM11/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Indeed your browser is not running the code from my pull request. Either you are not actually running the patched version of the plugin, or you need to force-reload the page to convince the browser to ignore its previously cached version of the script.

(It is likely a Jenkins core bug that a force reload is needed, of course. I see Last-Modified and Expires headers. Normally these are not supposed to matter because restarting Jenkins would serve static resources from a new randomized URL. It seems Functions.generateConsoleAnnotationScriptAndStylesheet is incorrect.)

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 13, 2018, 12:31:02 PM11/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Regarding the apparent Jenkins core bug, I filed PR 3757.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 14, 2018, 9:47:02 AM11/14/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

I assume that by force reload the page, you mean reload without cache. That i have done.

The plugin version that i have seems to be the correct one, i also sent you the proof for it. What other way can i ensure that im running that version?

Is there any step i can take here to assist of any help? Or just wait for PR 3757? 

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 14, 2018, 11:17:02 AM11/14/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Force reload on Chromium is Ctrl-Shift-R. I do not know about other browsers. Core PR 3757 would merely avoid the need to do this manually.

Somehow either your browser is continuing to cache the old file, or you are not really running the correct version, or the old version is lying around somewhere and mixing things up. It is hard to guess without having hands-on access to your server. You can check something like

and compare the result to this revision which should also be present as org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/job/console/NewNodeConsoleNote/script.js in WEB-INF/lib/workflow-job.jar in your $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/workflow-job.jpi. (You installed the experimental build via the upload form in Plugin Manager » Advanced I hope? Check the plugins/ directory for stray files.)

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 14, 2018, 2:08:02 PM11/14/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

By the way I found that the core bug was already filed: JENKINS-38719

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 14, 2018, 2:15:01 PM11/14/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

So that means that the page is already being refreshed without cache. This brings us to the conclusion that the actual patch that you sent me, is not correctly uploaded or not correctly working.

What steps can i take to upload the plugin besides the manage plugins > advanced?

Afterwards how can i ensure 100% that the correct plugin is actually uploaded?

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 14, 2018, 3:09:02 PM11/14/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Well I downloaded https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/incrementals/org/jenkins-ci/plugins/workflow/workflow-job/2.29-rc915.1276983ff71c/workflow-job-2.29-rc915.1276983ff71c.hpi and it has the script.js of length 4877, unlike the older one of length in 3816 in https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/public/org/jenkins-ci/plugins/workflow/workflow-job/2.28/workflow-job-2.28.hpi so I believe the problem is on your end. Please check the diagnostics I suggested in my last message.

And yes Plugin Manager » Advanced is the correct way to install downloaded plugins. I was making sure you did not manually dump it into the plugins/ directory under an unexpected name, for example.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 7:03:04 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Hi, sorry for the late reply, we were in a middle of a release.

From now and on, this issue is prioritized from us. I was trying to investigate on it and below are my results:

Curling our jobs page is not possible due to another failure with gitOauth plugin, which doesnt give permission to anyone to view the jobs unless you are an admin. However, when this step is manually done, the script seems to be the wrong one.
I've tried hard refreshing the page manually, but still the script remains unchanged. We even restarted our jenkins, and still the script is unchanged and doesnt match to [the revision|https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-job-plugin/blob/1276983ff71ccaf81e22392ff0b5072bcf664c26/src/main/resources/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/job/console/NewNodeConsoleNote/script.js. |https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-job-plugin/blob/1276983ff71ccaf81e22392ff0b5072bcf664c26/src/main/resources/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/job/console/NewNodeConsoleNote/script.js].I]

I have also checked the script on ` org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/job/console/NewNodeConsoleNote/script.js` of our `workflow-job.jar` and its still the outdated one.

I went on the docker container to look further on the plugin. On `plugins/`I have a directory called 'workflow-job' and two files `workflow-job.jpi` and `workflow-job.bak`. The jpi file and bak file i didnt manage to open, however on workflow job there was WEB-INF and META-INF. I looked through these two directories and on `/var/jenkins_home/plugins/workflow-job/META-INF/maven/org.jenkins-ci.plugins.workflow/workflow-job` i saw the a file `pom.properties` which when catted gave me this:

#Generated by Maven
#Fri Nov 09 14:36:27 EST 2018
version=2.29
groupId=org.jenkins-ci.plugins.workflow
artifactId=workflow-job

Which ensures the correct version of the plugin.

I also have pom.xml there. If you think it can be interesting i can send that to you as well.

At this point I am confused. There is no other version of this plugin installed and yet although the version checks out, the changes dont. How can i further debug this issue?

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 10:02:02 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

2.29 is a released version of the plugin. The last version with the fix that I supplied you is 2.29-rc915.1276983ff71c. So you are not running the correct version. Possibly the issue is that another release was cut of the plugin after I last brought the PR up to date, and you may have applied that update from the update center without noticing that it would clobber the manual update. Here is a new build, 2.30-rc928.54893f9a5f5c.

Regarding *.jpi files, these are simply ZIP (JAR) files.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 10:59:02 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Have now moved to a local build on my machine so that i can test new stuff.

I had the 2.29 by default on my machine and i got the 2.30 (the one u just suggested)

I still get the same issue. The JS script is not running on my browser. Its the outdated one.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 10:59:02 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: image-2018-11-20-16-58-04-034.png

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 11:00:02 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
Have now moved to a local build on my machine so that i can test new stuff.


I had the 2.29 by default on my machine and i got the 2.30 (the one u just suggested)
!image-2018-11-20-16-58-04-034.png!


I still get the same issue. The JS script is not running on my browser. Its the outdated one.


Edit: Is it possible that this plugin is somehow depended on other plugins?

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 11:06:01 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Please go through the steps I outlined before to verify what is really present in your $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/workflow-job.jpi.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 11:21:01 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini updated an issue
Change By: fisnik hajredini
Attachment: image-2018-11-20-17-20-19-040.png

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 11:21:02 AM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

-Unzipped workflow-job.jpi
--unzipped WEB-INF/lib/workflow-job.jar
— Checked WEB-INF/lib/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/job/console/NewNodeConsoleNote/script.js. The File checks out with the latest github code.

First time the variants werent visible, so i force refreshed my browser. I got them (although slightly disoriented)

 

Thank you for the help.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 20, 2018, 12:12:01 PM11/20/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

There we go at last. The visual appearance can probably be improved by someone more familiar with CSS.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 21, 2018, 6:24:02 AM11/21/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Also noticed another minor issue. The variants are visible only on /consoleFull logs. If its only console then the variants wont be visible.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 22, 2018, 6:58:01 AM11/22/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

The issue doesnt seem that minor anymore. The  [variant] is not searchable through CTRL+F. Also if u view the logs as plain text, you get no information of the variants. Having ~10MB of logs with >5 different variants makes it difficult to track the variant.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Nov 27, 2018, 9:18:02 AM11/27/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Not sure about the console vs. consoleFull issue. Should be visible in both. Would have to see if this is a reproducible issue.

Regarding Ctrl-F, well, this is up to the browser. In this case the text is CSS-injected so it may decide not to include it in search.

Regarding the raw console log, yes there is no branch information since this is added as a UI nicety on top of the HTML view. If you are interested in raw output from a particular step, you can download it directly.

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 12, 2018, 3:18:03 PM12/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 12, 2018, 3:18:06 PM12/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Devin Nusbaum commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

I just released Pipeline Job Plugin 2.31, which shows the branch names for parallel branches whenever log output transitions from one branch to another in the classic UI. See the attached screenshot for an idea of what it looks like:

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 12, 2018, 3:18:07 PM12/12/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Change By: Devin Nusbaum
Status: In Review Resolved
Resolution: Fixed
Released As: workflow-job 2.31

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 5:24:02 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
fisnik hajredini commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

Devin Nusbaum Just as a side note, its quite important to have the logs viewed on the raw console log as well as being searched via CTRL+F. Might want to open a bug regarding that one and also the logs not being seen on the console(only visible on consoleFull).

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 9:18:02 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fisnik hajredini FWIW I tried to reproduce your console vs. consoleFull issue before I released the change but could not reproduce it. Both URLs showed the branch names for me correctly.

Regarding branch names in the raw logs, I think it would be possible to add them back, although I do not recall if Jesse Glick removed them intentionally (perhaps to cut down on bloat in raw logs?).

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 9:20:02 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Devin Nusbaum edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
[~fhajredini] FWIW I tried to reproduce your console vs. consoleFull issue before I released the change but could not reproduce it. Both URLs showed the branch names for me correctly.

Regarding branch names in the raw logs, I think it would be possible to add them back, although I do not recall if [~jglick] removed them intentionally (perhaps to cut down on bloat in raw logs?)
, so it would be good to make sure we understand whether there would be any drawbacks before we add them back in .

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 10:11:03 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Regarding the console vs consoleFull : I think its possible that if the Console only, shows all the log, then it will still print out the variants. Otherwise it wont. At least in my case i just double checked and it still doesnt show the logs on Console only (even with Pipeline Job 2.31)

 

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 10:13:02 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fisnik hajredini You mean that it doesn't work if the logs are truncated and only the most recent lines are shwon? I will try to reproduce the issue that way.

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 10:14:03 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Devin Nusbaum edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
[~fhajredini] You mean that it doesn't work if the logs are truncated and only the most recent lines are shwon shown ? I will try to reproduce the issue that way.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 10:23:02 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Exactly. If the logs are long enough that the 'ConsoleLog' view is required to see all the logs, then on 'Console' only the variants wont be shown. Just a wild guess, cos i saw your test output was short, and our log outputs are always >10.000 line. 

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 11:04:02 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

fisnik hajredini Ok, I was able to reproduce the issue for log files that are truncated. I'm not sure what is going on, but I'll take a look.

fhajredini@luxoft.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 11:19:02 AM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

dnusbaum@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 1:11:01 PM12/13/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

The problem is that when the log is truncated, the span elements with the pipeline-new-node class that would have triggered this behavior.js rule are not present (because they only occur at the beginning of the parallel branch), so the rule is not triggered. If you have a parallel block that shows up in full at the end of the log then its branches are displayed even if the branches for prior parallel blocks are not. Maybe we could separate the rule that shows branch names from the rule that adds show/hide buttons and have it look for  `pipeline-node-*` blocks instead so that the start of the branch doesn't need to be present for it to work.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 3, 2019, 6:09:02 PM1/3/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Yes the lack of pipeline-new-node spans from truncated lines is a known issue affecting also show / hide links. I am not sure whether the proposed separation would work well; the current code uses the Behaviour system which is more efficient than just searching for all elements. Possibly the server side could emit the opening spans for nodes started before the truncation point but completed after it, though this cannot be done trivially by inspecting the start parameter since that would break incremental display.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 3, 2019, 6:11:02 PM1/3/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Regarding branch names in the raw logs, I think it would be possible to add them back

They were removed from the raw log intentionally; rendering of branch names is now done on the client side rather than being (redundantly) kept in the log file. Since the consoleText streams the raw log without any metadata, we do not see it. There could I suppose be some intermediate variant that processes the log in certain ways like this one but emits text/plain.

joerg.schwaerzler@infineon.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 4, 2019, 2:26:03 PM4/4/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Since this ticket is closed I have to ask: Is there already somewhere another ticket out there about the branch names not being searchable anymore? Doesn't work with Chrome or Firefox.
And you clearly do not want to use IE or Edge with Jenkins - so I didn't even gave them a shot.

In addition to that Chrome used to be the only browser being able to highlight all occurrences of a particular branch in the scroll bar - that way one could easily find an issue related to one branch only.

Especially for bigger pipelines with lots of branches we still need this.

The show/hide feature is quite nice. However what we would need is to be able to completely hide all branches (completely, all occurrences) except the chosen one. Only that would make the search obsolete. Is that / will that be possible?

joerg.schwaerzler@infineon.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 4, 2019, 2:26:04 PM4/4/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Joerg Schwaerzler edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
Since this ticket is closed I have to ask: Is there already somewhere another ticket out there about the branch names not being searchable anymore? Doesn't work with Chrome or Firefox.
And you clearly do not want to use IE or Edge with Jenkins - so I didn't even gave give them a shot.


In addition to that Chrome used to be the only browser being able to highlight all occurrences of a particular branch in the scroll bar - that way one could easily find an issue related to one branch only.

Especially for bigger pipelines with lots of branches we still need this.

The show/hide feature is quite nice. However what we would need is to be able to completely hide all branches (completely, all occurrences) except the chosen one. Only that would make the search obsolete. Is that / will that be possible?

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 4, 2019, 2:38:02 PM4/4/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Is there already somewhere another ticket out there

If it is not Link ed here, then I would presume not.

what we would need is to be able to completely hide all branches (completely, all occurrences) except the chosen one. Only that would make the search obsolete. Is that / will that be possible?

It could be, using some CSS/JS manipulations, as suggested here. That would of course deserve its own (linked) issue.

joerg.schwaerzler@infineon.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 5, 2019, 8:51:02 AM4/5/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Jesse Glick: Thanks for the quick feedback. I created two new tickets linking them to this one (and to each other).

joerg.schwaerzler@infineon.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 5, 2019, 8:51:05 AM4/5/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Joerg Schwaerzler edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
[~jglick]: Thanks for the quick feedback. I created two new tickets linking them to this one (and to each other) . :
JENKINS-56910
JENKINS-56913

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 11:47:03 AM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 11:47:04 AM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 11:47:05 AM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
sakshi sood commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

Not sure why this ticket is closed. What was the fix ? We are still not able to see the branch names in console logs. I mean its visible at the start of the step but not in the complete console log which makes it difficult to find out on which step I am on. Please check my earlier and now screenshot. 

 

Using plugin version 2.31

and Jenkins version 2.150.3

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 11:51:03 AM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
sakshi sood edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
Not sure why this ticket is closed. What was the fix ? We are still not able to see

After upgrading Jenkins
the branch names in console logs logformat for Pipeline jobs changed . I mean its visible at the start of the step but not in the complete console log which makes Due to this change it difficult 's no longer clear which line belongs to find out on which step I am on . This is a problem when looking at parallel steps.
 
Please check my earlier and now screenshot. 

 

Using plugin version 2.31

and Jenkins version 2.150.3

!earlier.JPG!!now.JPG!

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 12:19:03 PM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 12:19:06 PM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
sakshi sood edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
Not sure why this ticket is closed. What was the fix ?
After upgrading Jenkins the logformat for Pipeline jobs changed. Due to this change it's no longer clear which line belongs to which step. This is a problem when looking at parallel steps.

 
Please check my earlier and now screenshot. 

 

Using plugin version 2.31

and Jenkins version 2.150.3

!earlier.JPG!
!now.JPG!

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 12:20:04 PM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Not sure why this ticket is closed. What was the fix ?
After upgrading Jenkins the logformat for Pipeline jobs changed. Due to this change it's no longer clear which line belongs to which step. This is a problem when looking at parallel steps.
 
Please check my earlier and now screenshot. 

 

Using plugin version 2.31

and Jenkins version 2.150.3

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 12:20:04 PM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
sakshi sood updated an issue
Change By: sakshi sood
Attachment: now.JPG
Attachment: earlier.JPG

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 12:20:05 PM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
sakshi sood updated an issue
Change By: sakshi sood
Comment:
Not sure why this ticket is closed. What was the fix ?
After upgrading Jenkins the logformat for Pipeline jobs changed. Due to this change it's no longer clear which line belongs to which step. This is a problem when looking at parallel steps.
 
Please check my earlier and now screenshot. 

 

Using plugin version 2.31

and Jenkins version 2.150.3

!now.JPG!

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 12:21:04 PM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Not sure why this ticket is closed. What was the fix ?
After upgrading Jenkins the logformat for Pipeline jobs changed. Due to this change it's no longer clear which line belongs to which step. This is a problem when looking at parallel steps.
 
Please check my earlier and now screenshot. 

 

Using plugin version 2.31

and Jenkins version 2.150.3

!earlier.JPG! !now.JPG|thumbnail!

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 10, 2019, 5:01:02 PM4/10/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

sakshi sood yes the format has changed. In your second screenshot, everything at or below [junit] is coming from that branch, until the next such mark.

sakshisood.sood4@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 12, 2019, 4:55:02 AM4/12/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Jesse Glick This change has made troubleshooting of the issues difficult. it's no longer clear which line belongs to which step. I have to scroll too many times to understand if i get some error to identify the error belongs to which step. Can this be reverted? If not, Is there any configuration change I can make to get the old behavior ?

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 12, 2019, 9:33:06 AM4/12/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

tuttul13@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jul 8, 2019, 12:17:03 PM7/8/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

tuttul13@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jul 8, 2019, 12:17:06 PM7/8/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Shah Chowdhury updated an issue
 
Change By: Shah Chowdhury
Comment:
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-54304?focusedCommentId=357033&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-357033

 

We need the Branch Names in the Raw Logs. We have various tools/log-formatters that parse through raw logs. Please put this back.

tuttul13@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jul 8, 2019, 12:20:04 PM7/8/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

 "Regarding branch names in the raw logs, I think it would be possible to add them back"

We need the Branch Names in the Raw Logs. We have various tools/log-formatters that parse through raw logs. Please put this back.

abubadabu@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 13, 2019, 7:43:05 AM8/13/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Abubadabu reopened an issue
 

Hey Jesse Glick,

the change done here has killed our complete option to forward the log data to an external instance! This is really a major change that should be undone! Who cares about the log to be shown within the UI if you operate Jenkins within a corporation where you have some hundert jenkins jobs - you simply don't scroll trough the jobs anymore - you have to have some external processing.

Before this change we where able to forward all logs to an external FileBeat, split the logs via Logstash and process it within ElasticSearch. With this change, we are limited to the Jenkins UI.

With this change, there is currently NO way to forward the logs! The only way is the logstash plugin - but here you have to adapt all jobs and don't have any global "forward everything" option anymore (if you rely on 100% pipeline jobs).

 

Please re-add the [pipeline step name] and also remove the binary encoded stuff (8mha:////) from the logs.

Change By: Abubadabu
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved Reopened

abubadabu@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 13, 2019, 7:48:03 AM8/13/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com


the change done here has killed our complete option to forward the log data to an external instance! This is really a major change that should be undone! Who cares about the log to be shown within the UI if you operate Jenkins within a corporation where you have some hundert jenkins jobs - you simply don't scroll trough the jobs anymore - you have to have some external processing.

 

Before this change we where able to forward all logs to an external FileBeat, split the logs via Logstash and process it within ElasticSearch. With this change, we are limited to the Jenkins UI.

 

With this change, there is currently NO efficient way to forward the logs anymore ! The only way is the logstash plugin - but here you have to adapt all jobs and don't have any global "forward everything" option anymore (if you rely on 100% pipeline jobs).


 

Please re-add the [pipeline step name] and also remove the binary encoded stuff (8mha:////) from the logs.

abubadabu@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 13, 2019, 7:48:08 AM8/13/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Abubadabu edited a comment on Bug JENKINS-54304
Hey [~jglick],

the change done here has killed our complete option to forward the log data to an external instance! This is really a major change that should be undone! Who cares about the log to be shown within the UI if you operate Jenkins within a corporation where you have some hundert jenkins jobs - you simply don't scroll trough the jobs anymore - you have to have some external processing.

 

Before this change we where able to forward all logs to an external FileBeat, split the logs via Logstash and process it within ElasticSearch. With this change, we are limited to the Jenkins UI.

 

With this change, there is currently NO efficient way to forward the logs anymore! The only way is the logstash plugin - but here you have to adapt all jobs and don't have any global "forward everything" option anymore (if you rely on 100% pipeline jobs).

 

Please re-add the [pipeline step name] and also remove the binary encoded stuff (8mha:////) from the logs.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 13, 2019, 9:36:03 PM8/13/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick resolved as Fixed
 

Abubadabu please see linked issues and do not reopen.

Change By: Jesse Glick
Status: Reopened Resolved
Resolution: Fixed

tuttul13@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 14, 2019, 6:17:03 PM8/14/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Shah Chowdhury commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

We ended up reverting back to the old (2.25) level.

Branch Names in the Raw Logs is critical for us. We have various tools/log-formatters that parse through raw logs. Please put this back. 

tuttul13@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 14, 2019, 6:18:05 PM8/14/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Shah Chowdhury reopened an issue
 
Change By: Shah Chowdhury
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved Reopened

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 14, 2019, 6:31:03 PM8/14/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick resolved as Fixed
 

Shah Chowdhury as above.

Change By: Jesse Glick
Status: Reopened Resolved
Resolution: Fixed

gdemengin@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 27, 2019, 5:05:03 PM9/27/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Guillaume DeMengin commented on Bug JENKINS-54304
 
Re: Jobs in parallel dont display the variant they are running.

this issue might be fixed in the GUI ...
but it still exists for 2 uses cases in which variant information is not available anymore and makes some parts of the logs unusable:

  • when logs are accessed programmatically (using currentBuild.rawBuild.log for example)
  • when logs are accessed through the /consoleText link (to import the logs in a log gatherer for example)

for those 2 uses cases this workaround might help: https://github.com/gdemengin/pipeline-logparser
(implementation of https://stackoverflow.com/a/57351397/8380249)

This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)
Atlassian logo
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages