[JIRA] (JENKINS-46515) Launcher will retry connections forever under some irrecoverable status

4 views
Skip to first unread message

o.v.nenashev@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 7, 2018, 5:35:02 AM3/7/18
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Oleg Nenashev updated Bug JENKINS-46515
 
Jenkins / Bug JENKINS-46515
Launcher will retry connections forever under some irrecoverable status
Change By: Oleg Nenashev
Status: In Progress Review
Add Comment Add Comment
 
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)
Atlassian logo

jthompson@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Apr 30, 2019, 4:13:05 PM4/30/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Change By: Jeff Thompson
Status: In Review Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Released As: Remoting 3.30
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)

o.v.nenashev@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
May 6, 2019, 11:19:03 AM5/6/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Oleg Nenashev updated an issue
Change By: Oleg Nenashev
Released As: Remoting 3.30 , Jenkins 2.176

o.v.nenashev@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
May 6, 2019, 11:19:03 AM5/6/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

ogondza@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
May 23, 2019, 3:12:02 AM5/23/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

jnord@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
May 28, 2019, 5:53:02 AM5/28/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
James Nord commented on Bug JENKINS-46515
 
Re: Launcher will retry connections forever under some irrecoverable status

noting that this introduced a regression, where an agent is spun and connects before jenkins has enabled a temporary jnlp endpoint for a cloud.

jthompson@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jun 11, 2019, 1:38:02 PM6/11/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

The Remoting release (3.30) containing this change was reverted from Jenkins core because it introduced a regression in some other scenarios, particularly involving cloud agents. I'm going to revert it from the Remoting master branch and create a new release without it and containing the changes included in 3.30.

See #JENKINS-57759 and #JENKINS-57713 

Javier Delgado (or someone else), if you are interested you can re-open this issue or create a similar one and propose a new approach that resolves the issues described here and maintains sequence needed by the other scenarios.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages