[JIRA] (JENKINS-46086) A changelog should be recorded for the first build of a PR

0 views
Skip to first unread message

chenfli@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jan 23, 2019, 5:21:01 AM1/23/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Chen Fliesher commented on Improvement JENKINS-46086
 
Re: A changelog should be recorded for the first build of a PR

This issue is still relevant even if more than 1 year had passed.

For example, this is the dump for a changelog for the 1st PR

ChangeSets
17:49:01 <java.util.LinkedList@20 size=1 first=java.util.LinkedList$Node@201a254b last=java.util.LinkedList$Node@201a254b modCount=1>
The first ChangeSets
17:49:01 <java.util.ArrayList@1 elementData=[] size=0 modCount=0>,

I think there should be a way to follow the branch on the Pull Request, this example if from Github repository
Add Comment Add Comment
 
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)

aburdajewicz@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jun 20, 2019, 10:12:03 PM6/20/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

rsandell I believe this should not be fixed ?

jeanfred1@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 11, 2019, 10:18:05 AM9/11/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Change By: Jean-Frédéric
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved In Review
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.6#713006-sha1:cc4451f)
Atlassian logo

jeanfred1@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 11, 2019, 10:18:05 AM9/11/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Change By: Jean-Frédéric
Status: In Review Progress

jeanfred1@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 11, 2019, 10:19:04 AM9/11/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jean-Frédéric closed an issue as Duplicate
Change By: Jean-Frédéric
Status: In Progress Closed
Resolution: Duplicate

jeanfred1@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,
Sep 11, 2019, 10:20:03 AM9/11/19
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jean-Frédéric commented on Improvement JENKINS-46086
 
Re: A changelog should be recorded for the first build of a PR

(The issue was closed as Resolved/Fixed, which based on my understanding was slightly misleading − it’s closed as duplicate of JENKINS-44849. Hopefully this is now clearer )

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages