[JIRA] (JENKINS-27129) More consistent use of PauseAction

2 views
Skip to first unread message

svanoort@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Jun 15, 2016, 11:19:01 AM6/15/16
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Sam Van Oort commented on Bug JENKINS-27129
 
Re: More consistent use of PauseAction

+1 for tracking these with a common base. If we go this course, could we move the PauseAction should probably be moved to workflow-api actions, to avoid potential dependency issues and make it easier to consume?
Add Comment Add Comment
 
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.1.7#71011-sha1:2526d7c)
Atlassian logo

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 29, 2016, 1:32:01 PM8/29/16
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick updated an issue
 
Jenkins / Bug JENKINS-27129
Change By: Jesse Glick
Component/s: workflow-basic-steps-plugin
Component/s: pipeline

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Aug 29, 2016, 1:33:03 PM8/29/16
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com
Jesse Glick commented on Bug JENKINS-27129
 
Re: More consistent use of PauseAction

Uh, yes, it should have been in workflow-api to begin with.

jglick@cloudbees.com (JIRA)

unread,
Mar 17, 2020, 4:07:02 PM3/17/20
to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Also makes sense in ExecutorStep while the task is in the queue.
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.12#713012-sha1:6e07c38)
Atlassian logo
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages