[JIRA] (JENKINS-23349) Item names containing an emoji are not accessible

chris@orr.me.uk (JIRA)

unread,

Mar 15, 2017, 7:12:03 AM3/15/17

to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Christopher Orr updated an issue

Jenkins /

JENKINS-23349

Item names containing an emoji are not accessible

Change By:	Christopher Orr
Summary:	Views with a name that start with Item names containing an emoji are not accessible

Add Comment

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.3.0#73011-sha1:3c73d0e)

slide.o.mix@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,

Aug 13, 2019, 3:23:03 PM8/13/19

to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Alex Earl commented on

JENKINS-23349

Re: Item names containing an emoji are not accessible

I'm unable to reproduce this on 2.176.2. I created a job with the snowman emoji in the name and it worked fine. I was able to edit the configuration and everything.

Add Comment

This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.11.2#711002-sha1:fdc329d)

boards@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,

Aug 13, 2019, 3:32:03 PM8/13/19

to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Matt Sicker commented on

JENKINS-23349

Re: Item names containing an emoji are not accessible

Updates to Unicode support in Java likely fixed this bug since Jenkins has required Java 8 for a while now. The initial ticket is using Java 7.

Add Comment

slide.o.mix@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,

Aug 13, 2019, 5:57:02 PM8/13/19

to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Alex Earl commented on

JENKINS-23349

Re: Item names containing an emoji are not accessible

It actually looks like there are still issues here. Snowman works (https://emojipedia.org/snowman/), but "ugaritic letter thanna" does not (https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+10398)

Add Comment

boards@gmail.com (JIRA)

unread,

Aug 14, 2019, 4:01:04 PM8/14/19

to jenkinsc...@googlegroups.com

Matt Sicker commented on

JENKINS-23349

Re: Item names containing an emoji are not accessible

I was about to say that it was a newer emoji, but it appears as though it's not new at all. Strange.

I know that we use XML 1.1 instead of 1.0 in order to allow for better Unicode support, though that's likely irrelevant here unless you're trying to use an emoji in an XML tag name.