Move the LTS baseline selection to take place 2 weeks earlier in the cycle

61 views
Skip to first unread message

Oliver Gondža

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 6:43:49 AM3/30/20
to jenkin...@googlegroups.com
As agreed on 2.204.* LTS line retrospective[1], I am proposing to adjust
LTS schedule so that next LTS baseline will be selected in week 10 when
.3 RC is published. It used to be in week 12 when .3 is released. There
ware 2 reasons for this:

- Lately, we slowly shifted towards choosing too new baselines
effectively shortening the core soak time. Making the call 2 weeks
sooner (no matter how new the core) will create the time buffer for more
issues to be discovered and fixed before the LTS is published.

- Core developers/reviewers tend to be busy testing during RC testing
periods and preparing weeklies that are likely to be chosen an LTS
baseline (LTS week 10-12). Making the call 2 weeks sooner will prevent
the two to overlap.

Please let us know your thoughts and concerns by the end of the week.

[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NzR1XtkCfk6MDSD1jRq5H-iPSjqKvP-pfUO0b9lVZ9k/edit?disco=AAAAJRfN_wA
[2] https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/3017

Thanks!
--
oliver

Oleg Nenashev

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 6:56:04 AM3/30/20
to Jenkins Developers
I am +1. We could definitely try it for the next baseline and to see whether it helps

Antonio Muñiz

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 7:37:07 AM3/30/20
to jenkin...@googlegroups.com
+1 Sounds good to me.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/149fa0f2-8d2e-4de4-812a-163faf7ad2c3%40googlegroups.com.


--
Antonio Muñiz
Human, Engineer
CloudBees, Inc.

Mark Waite

unread,
Mar 30, 2020, 9:32:44 AM3/30/20
to Jenkins Developers
+1 from me.

James Nord

unread,
Apr 2, 2020, 6:18:25 PM4/2/20
to Jenkins Developers
👍 from me
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages