[PROPOSAL] Unforking XStream

16 views
Skip to first unread message

Jesse Glick

unread,
Oct 12, 2020, 5:08:03 PM10/12/20
to Jenkins Dev
See https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/pull/309 for details. The core PR
has been prepared, along with PRs to a number of plugins which require
modification to be compatible. (All of those PRs can and should be
merged & released in advance of the core change.) I am hoping to get
this merged after the next LTS baseline has been cut, if there are no
objections.

Slide

unread,
Oct 12, 2020, 6:09:30 PM10/12/20
to jenkin...@googlegroups.com
This would be awesome, +1!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-de...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr1P2izJbsRE%2BCyA8NQgWkdTFPyaBZsXTTywKpeSNBafLw%40mail.gmail.com.


--

Gavin Mogan

unread,
Oct 12, 2020, 6:13:17 PM10/12/20
to Jenkins Developers
I'm totally on board with any and all unforking! This is awesome work

Marky Jackson

unread,
Oct 12, 2020, 6:22:13 PM10/12/20
to jenkin...@googlegroups.com
Non-binding +1

> On Oct 12, 2020, at 2:07 PM, Jesse Glick <jgl...@cloudbees.com> wrote:
>
> See https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/pull/309 for details. The core PR

Matt Sicker

unread,
Oct 13, 2020, 11:18:23 AM10/13/20
to jenkin...@googlegroups.com
+1 to un-forking. That's also in general to make maintenance easier
for anything forked.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8524AD23-57A3-41E0-940F-842553CFF285%40gmail.com.



--
Matt Sicker
Senior Software Engineer, CloudBees

Antonio Muñiz

unread,
Oct 20, 2020, 4:23:22 AM10/20/20
to jenkin...@googlegroups.com
Please go ahead! No more forking!



--
Antonio Muñiz
Human, Engineer
CloudBees, Inc.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages