We are still quite ways off from Jackson 3.0 being released, so the
only decision so far has been "at least Java 8",
which was done 2 years ago or so.
As to Java 11; I think I would suggest Java 17 as the version past 8
mostly so we could get direct Record support.
But. No need to decide yet -- I think there's bit of refactoring work
to be done for:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-future-ideas/wiki/JSTEP-1
before considering Java baseline.
I'll actually need to send something about my latest thinking on Java
package / Maven artifact names: instead of "com.fasterxml" I am
thinking of "tools.jackson" (just registered the domain :) ).
-+ Tatu +-