Dear Mr Sinha,┬а
Your uestionair is totally based on false allegations and a propaganda tomislead┬аmembers. I will take the opportunity to respond to your questions┬аand put back questions to you and candidates whom you are propagating┬аfor.┬а
1.┬а how much good is done in training programmes made in past except that these were BHARAT DARSHAN and give me your qualifications and credentials that you were made the faculty in many of them. More over┬аhow do you expect such seminars in last two years covid period.┬а
I put a counter question on you that there is huge amount of penalty of Service Tax due to these Seminars conducted in past. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR THIS. Not only this lot of Service Tax which is concealed of collections┬аin seminars conducted at chapter and zone levels. who will take the responsibility of the same.┬а
The spending in the court cases was forced by previous council members who did not lay proper rules and regulations ands started a tradition to rule on whims. LG is main culprit of it by holding the post with invalid DIN and not giving details of accounts. No council can escape the presence in the court if a case i filed against. To the best of my knowledge, first case was filed by Mr Jawahar Lal Tiku in connivance with present team members whom┬аyou are propagating for. Rest of the cases were only follow up cases.┬а
What is your reaction to this fact?
Delay in deposition of Subscription is not due to Corona. Members have not taken IIISLA membership seriously and this is forced on them by previous council members, particularly who accepted and consented 2015 amendments in Act and regulations with enhanced "no survey limit". Corona is just a alibi being being projected by you and the fact is the high minded attitude of those past council members whom you are supporting.┬а
what is your reply for delayed payments prior to corona and not paid for years altogether. Against all the rules Mr Nirmal Tripathi forced membership at half the entry fee to only winvotes. Even these members defaulted further payment till membership became mandatory. This is an indication that members were not intrested in IIISLA due to mismanagements of those whom you are supporting.┬а
In regard to Accounts not passed, there have been regular irregularities over the years. I wonder if you know and remember┬аthat there was as high as 60 Lacs rupees in suspence account when Mr Tadha Took the charge. Accounts should have been rejected then. Mr Sunil Vora tries to make up the accounts by transferring this suspence to Corpus Fund. But again further mess was sdone┬аby LG. Accounts were almost rejected when Mr LG was in chair in AGM. I earned a bad name to favour┬аhim and pleading for approval of┬а account┬аconditionally. But Mr LG cheated the members and never corrected the accounts. So with such a bad foundations, accounts had to be rejected.┬а
My question to you that why the accounts of North Zone for period of Mr Nirmal Tripathi as Sectratry┬аare not submitted till now. In what capacity Mr Lalit Gupta was holding a Delhi account and transacted 58 lacs in it with our any audit. Why are you silent on this account.
I AM SORRY TO SAY MR SINHA, BUT IF LIST OF PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING IIISLA TO PRESENT STATUS IS MADE THEN ON TOP OF THE LIST SHALL BE THOSE WHOM YOU ARE SUPPORTING NOW AND IN PAST ALSO. I AM NOT NAMING THOSE WHO HAVE LEFT US.┬а
I WANT TO WARN THE MEMBERS IF THIS TEAM IS VOTED TO POWER AND MR LG IS PRESIDENT IIISLA SHALL HAVE THE SAME FATE AS THAT OF IISA AND LICENSING ABOLISHING IS NEXT TARGET.┬а
C K BHATIA