Tree for ID : San Francisco : 12SEP21 : AK - 013

已查看 10 次
跳至第一个未读帖子

Aarti S. Khale

未读,
2021年9月12日 03:30:112021/9/12
收件人 efloraofindia
Tree seen in San Francisco.
Is it Eriobotrya japonica?
Aarti
P1290507.JPG
P1290508.JPG

J.M. Garg

未读,
2021年9月16日 03:27:442021/9/16
收件人 efloraofindia、Aarti S. Khale
I think looks different from images at Eriobotrya japonica

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/indiantreepix/CAJ6xDqZFEn05BWzitA2HirBUXX7XqUa3zPFPnm61BwCP3G9WJg%40mail.gmail.com.


--
With regards,
J.M.Garg
P1290507.JPG
P1290508.JPG

Aarti S. Khale

未读,
2021年9月16日 03:55:222021/9/16
收件人 Alastair Culham、J.M. Garg、efloraofindia
Alastair Ji, 
Thanks for your feedback and the information. 
Should we think of Eriobotrya japonica then? 
Regards,
Aarti 
 

On Thu, 16 Sep 2021, 13:16 Alastair Culham, <a.cu...@reading.ac.uk> wrote:

I think E. japonica is a very variable species, sensitive to growing conditions.  It’s the only widely cultivated Eriobotrya other than E. deflexa, and I don’t think it is that.

 

Kind regards,


Alastair

Aarti S. Khale

未读,
2021年9月16日 05:16:082021/9/16
收件人 Alastair Culham、J.M. Garg、efloraofindia
Thank you Alastair Ji.
Regards,
Aarti


On Thu, 16 Sep 2021, 13:27 Alastair Culham, <a.cu...@reading.ac.uk> wrote:

It is slightly odd for E. japonica but my view is that E. japonica is the most likely species so I would record it as that.

回复全部
回复作者
转发
0 个新帖子