No., Dodonea belongs to Sapindaceae, but Rumex to Polygonaceae, not
related.
On Jan 16, 6:56 pm, Padmanabhan Geetha <
iye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A doubt
> Since the fruits of Rumex look so much like Dodonea, is there some
> connection? Same family?
> geetha
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dinesh Valke <
dinesh.va...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:58 PM
> Subject: [indiantreepix:7646] Re: Fwd: [indiantreepix:6640] ID Request
> To: "J.M. Garg" <
jmga...@gmail.com>
>
> Cc: indiantreepix <
indian...@googlegroups.com>
>
> ... could PIX1 be *Rumex vesicarius*, the bladder dock ... it looks close to
> and PIX2 is most likely *Clerodendrum viscosum* (syn. *C. infortunatum*),
> the hill glory bower, Saraswaty's leaf, sticky glorybower
>
> Regards.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:37 PM, J.M. Garg <
jmga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Anybody on Rumex sp. in the first picture?
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Ananda Banerjee <
natural.hist...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 2008/12/19
> > Subject: [indiantreepix:6640] ID Request
> > To:
indian...@googlegroups.com
>
> > These two species are widely found around the Rajaji N.P
> > File Pictures from 2007/April.
> > Would like to be aware of both common name and scientific name.
>
> > Thanking you
> > Ananda
>
> > --
> > With regards,
> > J.M.Garg
> > "We often ignore the beauty around us"
> > Creating Awareness about Indian Flora & Fauna:
> >
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> > For learning about our trees & plants, please visit/ join Google e-group
> > (Indiantreepix)
http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix?hl=en- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -