These are some useful links:
http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=132355
http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=210002198
http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=109106&flora_id=800
Nice paper on Differences:
https://academic.oup.com/botlinnean/article/155/3/307/2420200
Photographs
http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=109105&flora_id=800
http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=109104&flora_id=800
http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=109103&flora_id=800
http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=109102&flora_id=800
http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=1351&flora_id=2
According to Farjon and Filer in "An Atlas of the World’s Conifers":
"In the Himalaya, Taxus wallichiana occurs E of T. contorta in
the wetter parts of the range; the transition zone between
the two taxa in Central nepal more or less coin-cides with
the climatic transition. it is known from E nepal, sikkim,
Bhutan and arunachal pradesh within the Himalayan range. However,
T. wallichiana has a much wider distribution."
It was a part of the Taxus wallichiana complex and was also reported
as T. wallichiana Zucc. in the literature as is also evident from the
herbarium specimens shown at Plants of the World Online (POWO). The
Plant List still consider Taxus contorta as a synonym of Taxus
wallichiana Zucc.
http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:263797-1
http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-2434832
The same person, A. Farjon, considered it as T. wallichiana in 2006
but T. contorta in 2008.
Garg ji, my specimens should be Taxus contorta Griff. only as per the
recent literature. Thank you for correcting me, otherwise, I would
have kept it as T. wallichiana.
Revising my BLOG also.
http://anilkthakur.blogspot.com/2020/04/himalayan-yew-potent-anti-cancerous.html
REGARDS
On 8/30/20, J.M. Garg <
jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Anil ji, for the beautiful images.
>
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 21:05, Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur <
>
aniltha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Garg ji,
>>
>> These photographs were sent to me by Panki Sood ji from UN heritage Great
>> Himalayan Park National Park. I had requested him to click these for me.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, 11:02 am J.M. Garg, <
jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Anil ji
>>>
>>> --
>>> With regards,
>>> J. M. Garg
>>>
>>> On Sat, 29 Aug, 2020, 9:32 am Dr. Anil Kumar Thakur, <
>>>
aniltha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Garg ji, I have asked one scientist to collect it's cones and seeds for
>>>> me, which may help me further.
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, 09:19 J.M. Garg, <
jmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, Anil ji.
>>>>> *Taxus fuana* Nan Li & R.R. Mill is a syn. of *Taxus contorta *Griff.
>>>>> as per Catalogue of Life
>>>>>>>> It should be within *T. wallichiana *or *T. fuana*. As per latest
>>>>>>>> literature (see eflora of china), *T. wallichiana* occurs in
>>>>>>>> Eastern Himalaya while what is occurring in western Himalaya is* T.
>>>>>>>> fuana.* I tried to check the characters too, which is also
>>>>>>>> seemingly matching more with *T. fuana. *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Earlier literatures refer western Himalayan material as *T.
>>>>>>>> baccata *(say Collett's Flora Simlensis), which was later
>>>>>>>> designated as *T. wallichiana* (e.g. Flowers of Himalaya) and now
>>>>>>>> as* T.
>>>>>>>> fuana*. However, you need to consult HFRI taxonomists to further
>>>>>>>>>>> (C. Himalaya to China (NW. Yunnan), SE. Vietnam, Sumatera,
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines, Sulawesi as per WCSP
>>>>>>>>>>> <
https://wcsp.science.kew.org/namedetail.do?name_id=378675>) as
>>>>>>>>>>> per comparative images at Taxus
>>>>>>>>>>> <
https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/m---z/t/taxaceae/taxus>