Problem with constraintIB validation

37 views
Skip to first unread message

Sagar G Nayak

unread,
Dec 30, 2024, 9:56:18 PM12/30/24
to IBAMR Users
Hello,
I am trying to validate constraintIB code by simulating flow through a packed bed of spheres. I am comparing the pressure difference across the bed predicted by IBAMR with that predicted by Ergun equation. IBAMR is giving a much higher pressure difference than expected (~7 times) and I am unable to figure out why. Can someone help me with this? I have attached the figure. Its a 3d channel with only one layer of spheres in z-direction.

Problem2: If I simulate a flow though constricted channel, the velocity rise at the throat is much higher than expected (figure attached). A_in = 1.2, V_in = 1, A_out = 0.3. V_out should be ~4 units but it is almost twice. I think both problems are related.

I would appreciate any help. Thanks

Screenshot from 2024-12-30 16-58-09.png
Screenshot from 2024-12-28 19-23-53.png

Boyce Griffith

unread,
Dec 31, 2024, 9:15:46 AM12/31/24
to IBAMR Users
For IB methods that use regularized delta functions, the numerical size of the immersed structures is slightly larger than their physical size. I would suggest running at a higher resolution to see how the results depend on grid resolution, and also using a narrower delta function (perhaps BSPLINE_3 or the poorly named DISCONTINUOUS_LINEAR) at the current resolution.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "IBAMR Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ibamr-users...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ibamr-users/5fdb7e58-8cac-4232-85b4-2da9de4983cen%40googlegroups.com.
<Screenshot from 2024-12-30 16-58-09.png><Screenshot from 2024-12-28 19-23-53.png>

Sagar G Nayak

unread,
Jan 8, 2025, 9:27:08 PMJan 8
to IBAMR Users
Thank you very much Dr. Griffith. That actually helped.
But when I increased the grid resolution, a patch of high pressure appeared at a corner near the inlet (figure attached). Can you please comment on that? Also, when I switch-on AMR (max_levels = 2), it refines the mesh near the left top and left bottom corners even though there are no structures at those places. I suppose it is because of velocity gradients. How can I overcome that?

Thanks again,
Screenshot from 2025-01-09 12-17-22.png

Boyce Griffith

unread,
Sep 6, 2025, 6:52:31 PM (2 days ago) Sep 6
to IBAMR Users
Sagar —

Did you ever sort out this pressure issue?

(It is probably obvious, but I am working my way back through my inbox. 😬)

— Boyce

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ibamr-users/97f00fc5-bc73-4cd6-b1c1-338a7eafbc41n%40googlegroups.com.
<Screenshot from 2025-01-09 12-17-22.png>

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages