On November 26, 2025 7:59:38 AM HST, Abrimaal <
abri...@wp.pl> wrote:
> Thanks for building the new version.
>
> The first impression: Wow, *dark background *> finally I can stitch night
> panoramas that waited for years.
> and this is the only *noticeable improvement* visible to an experienced
> photographer.
>
> In Batch processor, I noticed that when I check "*Shutdown computer*",
> Starting a new work next day, we simply don't remember (being humans) that
> the checkbox was selected.
> *(Human memory is not a hard drive storing binary data.)*
> The computer shuts down after stitching a panorama.
> Please take the checkbox as* One Time option*.
> At the next start the "*Shutdown*" gets *automatically unchecked.*
Makes sense to me.
> Hugin was dedicated for photographers, but written by programmers (there is
> no other way and this is the correct way).
> Photographers (using many drivers, thousands of folders and organized
> workflow), are not exactly interested in numeric parameters.
> The simple interface is the default tool for creating panoramas.
My default tool is the Advanced interface.
> Even when Hugin detects advanced features, and switches to *advanced mode*,
> when Opening a new file, please* return to the Simple interface*.
NO NO NO.
> In Batch processor, this button is long awaited:
> [ *Open containing folder* ] and point to that file in* Explorer.*
> with thousands of folders it will significantly speed up the work.
> If there is "Open in Hugin", the project may be also opened in Explorer.
>
> Also an option to *Delete* a selected* project* (.pto file) from the drive,
> from the level of the Batch processor.
> Anyway when *Open Containing Folder* is introduced, the project may be
> easily deleted in *Explorer*.
>
> Clean up (Remove finished projects from the Processor).
> It asks to remove Failed projects, but *"File missing*" stay on the list
> (are not removed from Batch).
>
> *Logs:*
> They are a inconvenience is smooth workflow. In fact, nobody except the
> developers needs them.
> Anyway they are saved every time when a project fails.
> Photographers have different minds than programmers (not %0101#DF5, we see
> images, that's why we are photographers).
> Humanists have also different minds - they see words. Musicians hear sounds.
As a writer, a musician, and a photographer, I have no problems dealing with numbers. Stops, field of view, exposure values, shutter speeds, ISO - all numbers. Photography, in particular, has long been connected with science, technology, and numbers.
Am I your idea of a humanist? I have B.A. and M.A. degrees in Creative Writing. I don't think coming from the humanities excludes understanding and use of numbers.
> It too difficult for us to write a command script, that goes through all
> folders and subfolders and deletes *all *.log files*.
> In Batch processor there are options: *Verbose Output* and *Always Save Log*
> - they are useful for developers.
> But what about users?
Useful to me when a stitch fails. And I'm not a developer.
> [*Never save Logs*] or [*Delete all Logs in current folder*]
>
> *Skipping unaligned images*.
> When Batch processor fails to find control points in a single image, the
> whole project fails and is not processed.
> When opening the .pto file in Hugin, the projection is not changed,
> exposures are not corrected (the *Steps in .assistant files)*.
> It could be done simpler and logically - all unaligned images are not
> processed (*excluded*), but the rest of images are processed (aligned,
> straightened, exposure corrected - depending on the assistant steps)
A feature I rarely use, and then only if all else fails.
> and the panorama becomes stitched without the excluded image(s).
Maybe an option, but in my experience the reason for "unaligned images" is usually that no control points were found *when they should have been*. So it tells me I need to add manual control points.
David W. Jones
gnome...@gmail.com
exploring the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
Sent from my Android device with F/LOSS K-9 Mail.