On 2015-05-03 7:43 PM, piccolbo wrote:
> This is my process: The object, a fruit bowl, is on a stool with a dark
> background, camera on a tripod. Shot 17 pics at approximately regular angular
> intervals by rotating the subject, not moving the camera. The distance remains
> consistent this way. [snip]
> Add horizontal line to each frame to avoid snake like stitch. Optimize
> positions first, then release a few parameters at a time to see what happen.
> Image above is obtained by optimizing everything. a, c, d,e, g are nontheless
> 0, TrX, TrY, TrZ almost 0. Plane yaw and pitch are mostly low, with a couple
> of outlier images. Worst distance is 25, most < 4. I am aware that parallax
> changes will make it challenging to map the fruit in a continuous way. I am
> just focusing on the bowl and no cps are on the actual fruit. Does anyone
> understand what is going on, let alone how to fix it? Thanks
>
> Antonio
I would add more horizontal control points to force the edges to be a horizontal
straight line. I would expect some large a,b,c numbers to distort each image.
Constraining the image to be a cylinder 360 by joining the L & R will help with
the optimization. After you can add end images. Or remove images to give it an end.
Any control points away from the seam of the two images should also be changed
to horizontal control points. This is not to make them a line but to throw away
the horizontal shift that would happen because of the parallax error and only
use the vertical shift to optimize.
I have been using horizontal control points in a similar way to help stitch
stereo images from multi camera rig.
Not sure if you should need any TrX, TrY, TrZ I would only add them at the end.
There is enough repeating pattern that automatic control point generation would
cause problems.
--
Jim Watters
http://photocreations.ca