Re: hugin_start-problem

[Andreas Metzler]

----- Forwarded message from Andreas Metzler <amet...@bebt.de> -----
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:22:23 +0200
From: Andreas Metzler <amet...@bebt.de>
To: hugin...@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: hugin_start-problem
Message-ID: <20140912172...@downhill.g.la>

On 2014-09-09 Bruno Postle <bruno@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon 08-Sep-2014 at 00:26 +0200, thomallajoachimhd@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> when I startHugin, the following notice appears:

>> ASSERT INFO:
>> ../src/common/wincmn.cpp(858): assert "Assert failure" failed in GetWindowBorderSize(): Unknown border style.

>> BACKTRACE:
>> [1] wxWindowBase::GetWindowBorderSize() const

> Can you tell us which version of wxidgets you have? and which
> version of Hugin?

> Note that this mailing list isn't used much, there is a more active list for
> developers and users on googlegroups: http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Hello Bruno,

we also see this on Debian <https://bugs.debian.org/761224> with
hugin 2014.0.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (i.e. 2014.0.0 rc4)
libwxbase3.0-0 3.0.1-3
libwxgtk3.0-0 3.0.1-3

cu Andreas

----- End forwarded message -----

[T. Modes]

Am Samstag, 13. September 2014 13:30:52 UTC+2 schrieb Andreas Metzler:

we also see this on Debian <https://bugs.debian.org/761224> with
hugin 2014.0.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (i.e. 2014.0.0 rc4)
libwxbase3.0-0            3.0.1-3
libwxgtk3.0-0             3.0.1-3

This has been fixed in the default branch.
Also the default branch contains a second patch for another assert failure and a patch to build with boost 1.56 (the reporter did not respond, if it is fixed.)

The first two patches have also applied to Debian packages (thanks Andreas).
So the question remain: should we apply the patches also to the 2014.0 branch? This will require a new release candidate (rc5).

Thomas
 

[Andreas Metzler]

Hello,

I am a little bit of two minds on this:

* On one hand the issue is release creitical. Obnixious warnings every
time hugin is run.

* OTOH afaik the bug only showed up Debian (and derivatives), who will
include the patch anyway.

cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

[T. Modes]

Hi,

Am Sonntag, 21. September 2014 13:30:59 UTC+2 schrieb Andreas Metzler:

I am a little bit of two minds on this:

I'm also.
I was hoping that our release manager or the builders would respond.

But no reaction.

Thomas

[Harry van der Wolf]

Theoretically I would vote for an RC5, but I have the idea that last RC versions have been hardly tested by users.

If it only occurs on Debian and derivatives and those have been patched already (does that include Ubuntu and Mint?), I'm also tempting to finally release the 2014.

Others have the same or another meaning on this?

Harry

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20140921113042.GC1218%40downhill.g.la.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[David W. Jones]

I just glanced at Debian Sid repository; it's only up to RC3. So RC4
might not have gotten much testing from Debian users.

If the patch fixes the error below on Debian, I'd say release it.

On 09/22/2014 08:39 AM, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> Theoretically I would vote for an RC5, but I have the idea that last RC
> versions have been hardly tested by users.
> If it only occurs on Debian and derivatives and those have been patched
> already (does that include Ubuntu and Mint?), I'm also tempting to
> finally release the 2014.
> Others have the same or another meaning on this?
>
> Harry
>
> 2014-09-21 13:30 GMT+02:00 Andreas Metzler <amet...@bebt.de

> <mailto:amet...@bebt.de>>:

>
> On 2014-09-18 "T. Modes" <Thomas...@gmx.de

> <mailto:Thomas...@gmx.de>> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 13. September 2014 13:30:52 UTC+2 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
>
> > > we also see this on Debian <https://bugs.debian.org/761224> with
> > > hugin 2014.0.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (i.e. 2014.0.0 rc4)
> > > libwxbase3.0-0 3.0.1-3
> > > libwxgtk3.0-0 3.0.1-3
> > >
>
> > This has been fixed in the default branch.
> > Also the default branch contains a second patch for another assert failure
> > and a patch to build with boost 1.56 (the reporter did not respond, if it
> > is fixed.)
>
> > The first two patches have also applied to Debian packages (thanks Andreas).
> > So the question remain: should we apply the patches also to the 2014.0
> > branch? This will require a new release candidate (rc5).
>
> Hello,
>
> I am a little bit of two minds on this:
>
> * On one hand the issue is release creitical. Obnixious warnings every
> time hugin is run.
>
> * OTOH afaik the bug only showed up Debian (and derivatives), who will
> include the patch anyway.
>
> cu Andreas


--

David W. Jones
gnome...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com

[Andreas Metzler]

David W. Jones <gnome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just glanced at Debian Sid repository; it's only up to RC3. So RC4
> might not have gotten much testing from Debian users.

[...]

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.ptx/35160
| Please note that Debian's 2014.0.0~rc3+dfsg-1 is identical to rc4
| except for the changelog since it contains both 10aa8ea89d9e and
| b2c6b668f052.

[David W. Jones]

On 09/25/2014 07:07 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> David W. Jones <gnome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just glanced at Debian Sid repository; it's only up to RC3. So RC4
>> might not have gotten much testing from Debian users.
> [...]
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.ptx/35160
> | Please note that Debian's 2014.0.0~rc3+dfsg-1 is identical to rc4
> | except for the changelog since it contains both 10aa8ea89d9e and
> | b2c6b668f052.
>
> cu Andreas

Ah, thanks.