A chart of the whaling grounds drawn in 1884 – Note the light shading is abandoned grounds i.e. those in memory at that time, it is likely that if records had gone back further that much more of the oceans would have been in the same light shading!
Bru
Pearce
E-mail b...@envisionation.org
Web www.envisionation.org Visit to participate in the Biosphere Restoration Plan by acquiring Empathy Coin options.
Skype brupearce
Mobile +44 7740 854713
Salcombe, Devon, UK
Information contained in this email and any files attached to it is confidential to the intended recipient and may be covered by legal professional privilege. If you receive this email in error, please advise by return email before deleting it; you should not retain the email or disclose its contents to anyone. Envisionation Ltd has taken reasonable precautions to minimise the risk of software viruses, but we recommend that any attachments are virus checked before they are opened. Thank you for your cooperation.
From: carbondiox...@googlegroups.com <carbondiox...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Bhaskar M V
Sent: 12 March 2025 04:19
To: Carbon Dioxide Removal <carbondiox...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [CDR] Re: Whales and carbon transport
Industrial Whaling and Fishing are the main reason why Photosynthesis / Primary Production in Oceans has decreased.
Decline in the Apex predators has reduced the recycling of the nutrients and micro-nutrients.
Decrease in Primary Production in Oceans is the main reason for accumulation of CO2 in the Atmosphere.
Restoring Primary Production in Oceans to historical peaks, and perhaps exceeding the peak to achieve the maximum possible,
is the best solution to consume the excess Carbon in Atmosphere and Oceans and convert it into Biomass in the Oceans.
Regards
Bhaskar
On Monday, 10 March 2025 at 20:08:51 UTC+5:30 goreau wrote:
Fluxes would have been “at least three times higher” before industrial whaling.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Carbon Dioxide Removal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
CarbonDioxideRem...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/0ad02d34-3474-4ae4-b311-e0beaaff1cc6n%40googlegroups.com.
Bru
Pearce
E-mail b...@envisionation.org
Web www.envisionation.org Visit to participate in the Biosphere Restoration Plan by acquiring Empathy Coin options.
Skype brupearce
Mobile +44 7740 854713
Salcombe, Devon, UK
Information contained in this email and any files attached to it is confidential to the intended recipient and may be covered by legal professional privilege. If you receive this email in error, please advise by return email before deleting it; you should not retain the email or disclose its contents to anyone. Envisionation Ltd has taken reasonable precautions to minimise the risk of software viruses, but we recommend that any attachments are virus checked before they are opened. Thank you for your cooperation.
Hi Bhaskar
Disrupted and unbalanced ecosystems. Fish in the main are feeding at the first level on zooplankton that are the primary grazers of phytoplankton and if there are not enough of them, because they are being poisoned by the pollution of microplastics and forever chemicals that are most concentrated at the surface, then there is another break in the system.
So I think we should be looking at which algae supports zooplankton, and what we can do to improve their environment.
Best,
Zooplankton mainly eat phytoplankton, but many filter feeding invertebrates such as oysters, consume diatoms directly, especially in coastal waters. Both food chains need to be stimulated to restore productivity and biogeochemical health.
Membrane PBRs can use coastal treated sewage outfall streams to capture and utilize the nutrients for CDR work and agricultural:
An integrated algal membrane photobioreactor as a green-transition technology for the carbon capture and utilization
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213343722002172
The challange is not in the biology or processing technology but in the need for rapid lowest cost infrastructure scale-up.
The hull technology would benefit from being largely self-replicating at the basic materials level, and thick walled high density polyethylene hulls that generate bio-ethylene via internal operations should fit the definition of a largely self-replicating infrastructure at the basic materials level. Biorock is also a largely self-replicating building material, and biorock production likely can be a benefit to microalgal production outputs and used as external armor for HDPE mPBRs.
Building robust and long lasting, largely self-replicating, C negative mPBRs specifically for coastal outfall upgrades is likely achievable with current technologies, as would be using the sewage outfall feedstock to help feed the whales clean feed. We are already feeding them our crap, let's upgrade the menu mCDR style.
Below is an example of what large mPBR hulls would look like:
https://youtu.be/qXtVQWHgNig?si=49DICUSB0ZN4MFsa
Bhaskar et al.,
Doing both is technically possible, yet reactors offer more environmental control and thus better crops growth and accounting and many more potential downstream coproducts.
Moreover, reactors likely provide maximum flexibility concerning crops that get grown. I don't understand how reactors would limit flexibility. Can you explain your view on that point?